Re: Second study confirms faster than light neutrinos

2011-11-21 Thread Sam
We know the straw people exist, we just ignore their comments on science because they don't have brains. . On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:04 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, they are out there. Straw people are especially interested in calling science into doubt. They don't believe in

Re: Second study confirms faster than light neutrinos

2011-11-21 Thread PT
Well, they do have a wizard. That has to count for something, right? - Because I can lie beautiful true things into existence ... Neil Gaiman on Why I write. On 11/21/2011 8:57 AM, Sam wrote: We know the straw people exist, we just ignore their comments on science because they don't

Re: Second study confirms faster than light neutrinos

2011-11-20 Thread Sam
Who ever said science doesn't work? Real people or ones made of straw? . On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote: So I'm fascinated, but more by the people who claim that science doesn't work because theories can be proven wrong.

Re: Second study confirms faster than light neutrinos

2011-11-20 Thread PT
Oh, they are out there. Straw people are especially interested in calling science into doubt. They don't believe in science because science precludes the belief in people made of straw. On 11/20/2011 4:35 PM, Sam wrote: Who ever said science doesn't work? Real people or ones made of straw?

Re: Second study confirms faster than light neutrinos

2011-11-19 Thread Gruss Gott
My favorite example is the car with a bb gun attached to it: * with the car stationary you fire a bb at a target 100' away. Let's say it takes 1 second to reach the target. * with the car moving at 50'/sec you fire a bb at the target after 1sec. To make it easy we'd all agree that the bb

Second study confirms faster than light neutrinos

2011-11-18 Thread Judah McAuley
The plot thickens as the proposed revised experiment yields the same results: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/second-experiment-confirms-faster-than-light-particles/2011/11/17/gIQAlRlTWN_story.html?wprss= They didn't mention the GPS relativity error factor that had been