> gMoney wrote:
> Matter of opinion, of course, but I think they stack up pretty well in the
> pompous department. Yer opinion may be tainted by politics, my opinion could
> easily be tainted by SportsCenter *grumble*
>
Ya know, I still don't agree on the pompous piece just because
Olbermann has a
On 11/1/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matter of opinion, of course, but I think they stack up pretty well in the
> pompous department. Yer opinion may be tainted by politics, my opinion could
> easily be tainted by SportsCenter *grumble*
Heh. Fair 'nuff. =]
~~~
On 11/1/06, Denny Valliant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 11/1/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We aren't discussing what they do, what they say, what they report, how
> > wrong they are, etcsimply talking ego and pomposity. You can ignore
> > Olbermann's if you want, because you a
On 11/1/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We aren't discussing what they do, what they say, what they report, how
> wrong they are, etcsimply talking ego and pomposity. You can ignore
> Olbermann's if you want, because you agree with him...but it's there.
Yuppers, everyone has ego. I a
We aren't discussing what they do, what they say, what they report, how
wrong they are, etcsimply talking ego and pomposity. You can ignore
Olbermann's if you want, because you agree with him...but it's there.
On 10/31/06, Denny Valliant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/30/06, G Money <[EM
On 10/30/06, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh bullshit. Olberman is every bit as pompous as Rush.
Nope. And Limbaugh /looks/ pompous, even. Cigar y todo. Heh.
And what about stuff like :"He's not encumbered by being politically
correct ... If you want to know what America used to be and
Oh bullshit. Olberman is every bit as pompous as Rush.
I agree with him more, obviously, but that doesn't make him less of a
pompous ass.
And yes, I'm still bitter he left Sportscenter.
On 10/27/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sam wrote:
> > Wow you watch that idiot and then have
On 10/27/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > DennyV wrote:
> > Anyways, I'll go for some more middle of the road folks on PBS if
> > I want "serious" pundits.
>
> Oo! Are you a NewsHour fan? Shields and Brooks? Best political
> commentary out there. Left, Right, and Center is pretty g
> DennyV wrote:
> Anyways, I'll go for some more middle of the road folks on PBS if
> I want "serious" pundits.
>
Oo! Are you a NewsHour fan? Shields and Brooks? Best political
commentary out there. Left, Right, and Center is pretty good too.
And Washington Week.
~
> Sam wrote:
> You crack me up. Who puts this sh!t in your head?
>
The liberals! They're not like us. They don't get it. They and all
of their supporters want to destroy America. Sam, we need to stand up
and be heard! We need to tell those liberals that we're not gonna put
up with them. Now
Intelligent like he played rugby a few too many times.
>drugged out sack of shit way that Rush is. In the intelligent way.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion inf
You crack me up. Who puts this sh!t in your head?
On 10/27/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for Rush, he isn't a political expert, he's a psychology expert.
> He knows how to craft divisive arguments that flatter his listeners
> and make them feel special. He appeals to their low s
On 10/27/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, not at all.
> But Rush has been talking politics for 18 years and is pretty much a
> pro at it. Doesn't mean you have to like him but he's got credential.
Yeowszers! Say it ain't so, Sam! He is so biased, I can't believe people
could use him as a
> Sam wrote:
> No, not at all.
> But Rush has been talking politics for 18 years
For the record Countdown is not a politics show, but a news show that
covers the top 5 interesting stories of the day as well as humorous
wacky news.
As for Rush, he isn't a political expert, he's a psychology expert
No, not at all.
But Rush has been talking politics for 18 years and is pretty much a
pro at it. Doesn't mean you have to like him but he's got credential.
Olbermann was a sportscaster that is trying a new career as a Bush
basher. He's basically the worse case scenario for the opposite of
Rush.
If
> Sam wrote:
> Wow you watch that idiot and then have the balls to make fun of Rush?
Oberman rocks! And yer right, he's biased, but not in that pompous
drugged out sack of shit way that Rush is. In the intelligent way.
He makes good points and then invites partisans on to ding him. Plus
it's f
heh. i was just funnin'.
but would it be that one is always correct and the other never is?
(of course, which is which depends on who answers the question) :)
On 10/27/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can't tell the difference, I'm not going to ruin it for you.
>
> On 10/27/06, Charli
If you can't tell the difference, I'm not going to ruin it for you.
On 10/27/06, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow. you listen to that idiot Rush and then have the balls to make
> fun of Oberman?
> Different strokes dude.
>
> :)
Wow. you listen to that idiot Rush and then have the balls to make
fun of Oberman?
Different strokes dude.
:)
On 10/27/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow you watch that idiot and then have the balls to make fun of Rush?
> True colors dude.
>
> On 10/27/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Wow you watch that idiot and then have the balls to make fun of Rush?
True colors dude.
On 10/27/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keith Oberman does a great job of recapping the correlation between
> elections and terrorist warnings. I sure he'll continue that great
> tradition tonigh
> G-Man wrote:
> Well this administration does have a history of election-time voter
> terrorism: "vote for us or you'll die!"
>
The oil market certainly thinks this is a bunch of hooey: prices are down.
~|
Introducing the Fusion
> tBone wrote:
> So is this the October surprise we've all been waiting for?
>
Well this administration does have a history of election-time voter
terrorism: "vote for us or you'll die!"
Keith Oberman does a great job of recapping the correlation between
elections and terrorist warnings. I sure
So is this the October surprise we've all been waiting for?
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 12:00 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: UK Issues Maritime Threat
>
> There goes the electio
There goes the election.
On 10/27/06, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There goes Exxon's profits...
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peer
There goes Exxon's profits...
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 8:45 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: UK Issues Maritime Threat
The UK issued a maritime warning and the US Navy is on high alert
based on information that Al-Q
> G-Manwrote:
> The UK issued a maritime warning and the US Navy is on high alert
Oops! Subject should read "UK issues maritime *warning*"
Although "threat" would be much cooler.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Up
The UK issued a maritime warning and the US Navy is on high alert
based on information that Al-Quaeda intends to attack US oil interests
in the Gulf region.
Don't have much more info than that.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority
27 matches
Mail list logo
