I was wondering that myself...which is probably why the judge didn't reject
google's claim outright. We did see this coming when Oracle bought
Sun...the writing was on the wall that they were going to try and pull some
stupid shit like this with Java.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Larry C
A judge who doesn't know a thing about technology?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> I don't understand how you can copy an API in the first place. Can
> somebody explain to me why this has not already been laughed out of
> court?
>
> On 5/10/12, Eric Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Judge
er, copyright, that is.
On 5/10/12, Dana wrote:
> I don't understand how you can copy an API in the first place. Can
> somebody explain to me why this has not already been laughed out of
> court?
>
> On 5/10/12, Eric Roberts wrote:
>>
>> Judge declines ejection of Google's fair use claim in cop
I don't understand how you can copy an API in the first place. Can
somebody explain to me why this has not already been laughed out of
court?
On 5/10/12, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> Judge declines ejection of Google's fair use claim in copyright
> infringement trial with Oracle...
>
> http://www.itw
Judge declines ejection of Google's fair use claim in copyright
infringement trial with Oracle...
http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/276302/judge-declines-eject-googles-fair-use-defense-android-trial?source=ITWNLE_nlt_today_2012-05-10
~~
