Once againpeople are stupid.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well it isn't just random graffitti if they voted for them in some
> races. But in the contested Al Franken race they wrote in Lizard
> People but filled in the bubble for one of the candidates. W
I guess that makes sense in a way. I called that one as insufficient
information, personally. There is a substantial case to be made that
they really meant to vote for Lizard people, or else why write them
in. I was unable to construct a scenario for that, though you just did
and yeah perhaps that
Well I took that as they listed who was available to them in their head on
the sheet ... mulled over the list. And in the end voted for Al Franken. So
I voted that the vote for Al Franken stands.
Seems simple enough to me. Of course they guy is still an idiot since the
other write-ins dont count,
well it isn't just random graffitti if they voted for them in some
races. But in the contested Al Franken race they wrote in Lizard
People but filled in the bubble for one of the candidates. WTH.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess they felt the L
I guess they felt the Lizard People weren't better than the other guy they
decided to vote for instead. :)
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> did you look at those? Why would someone write "Lizard people" on a
> ballot and (usually) vote for them, but not in every
did you look at those? Why would someone write "Lizard people" on a
ballot and (usually) vote for them, but not in every race?
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Scott Stroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The answer to that is simple...people are stupid.
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Dana <[EMA
The answer to that is simple...people are stupid.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wow. After looking at that , my question is why some of these people
> didn't just ask for a new ballot. I mean, if you fill in the wrong
> bubble, wouldn't that be easier than mak
wow. After looking at that , my question is why some of these people
didn't just ask for a new ballot. I mean, if you fill in the wrong
bubble, wouldn't that be easier than making people guess whether you
are trying to underline or cross out?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PRO
ZACKLY!
-- tony
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:13 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> guys, i think as a cf-comm team of developers
>> WE could make a fail proof voting system that was
>> coun
> guys, i think as a cf-comm team of developers
> WE could make a fail proof voting system that was
> country-wide, infallible, and do it all in cf and whatever
> front end they wanted.
>
> i really believe that.
and we're even a diverse enough group politically that nobody could
claim favoritism!
guys, i think as a cf-comm team of developers
WE could make a fail proof voting system that was
country-wide, infallible, and do it all in cf and whatever
front end they wanted.
i really believe that.
-- tony
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gauta
awesome.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look at real Minnesota challenged ballots and YOU vote on how they
> should be counted:
>
> http://minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2008/11/19_challenged_ballots/
>
~
Look at real Minnesota challenged ballots and YOU vote on how they
should be counted:
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2008/11/19_challenged_ballots/
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic
13 matches
Mail list logo
