I feel for you and your family on this; my wife and I went through this in
May. We got to bring our daughter home after only 15 days in the NICU, and
she was 7 weeks early due to pre-eclampsia, early labor that couldn't be
controlled through medication, and a 40% placental abruption. Here's hoping
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> The only way to dig out of the do nothing political quagmire that we've been
> in since the waning days of the Nixon administration, short of a third party
> gaining enough votes to win. Is for the center to finally exert it's
> dominance an
sucked since the 80's.. thank you
Aldridge Ames...
We may agree on more than a few things, but the talk of things like Obama's
"death committees" and the like is just ridiculous.
People need to spend more time finding real answers that work for the long
term..
--
Scott
Give it up Scott, the man is stuck in his own fantasy world. he's a firm
believer in never letting facts get in the way of a good delusion.
>No Sam... I've said it before...
>Centrist... C..E..N..T..R..I..S..T.. I look at issues, parites any more are
>antiquated and meaningless to the majority
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:57 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> No Sam... I've said it before...
> Centrist... C..E..N..T..R..I..S..T.. I look at issues, parites any more are
> antiquated and meaningless to the majority of people.
> Centrist.. Which is what the VAST majority of American people are.
By
ad of spending a ton of time on politics, say a
> prayer for my daughter, that she gets healthy and strong and can come home
> with her mommy and daddy who love her...
>
> --
> Scott Stewart
> ColdFusion Developer
> 4405 Oakshyre Way
> Raleigh, NC 27616
> (h) 919.874.6229 (c) 70
rong and can come home
with her mommy and daddy who love her...
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
-Original Message-----
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 11:06 AM
To: cf-community
Sub
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Scott Stewart wrote:
>
> The US has a very old document called the Constitution
> http://www.usconstitution.net/
>
> Please read it and refresh your memory. It has not, cannot and will not be
> subverted by either party, and they've both tried in recent history.
I
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Vivec wrote:
> *points*
> Found one.
>
> Cameron...you were saying something?
That part where I said they were loons or that people feel the need to
make up labels and apply them in order to have a good target to poke?
ay be able to catch up...
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 10:16 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: hahah..birther's want
thought that starving the beast was a good idea?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Great, he's doing wonders for California.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > I guess I can't muster enough interest to parse the bureaucratic
> argument.
> > Nor do I really ca
Great, he's doing wonders for California.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I guess I can't muster enough interest to parse the bureaucratic argument.
> Nor do I really care to be honest. I think they should repeal that provision
> so you can president Terminator.
>
~~
I guess I can't muster enough interest to parse the bureaucratic argument.
Nor do I really care to be honest. I think they should repeal that provision
so you can president Terminator.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> ???
>
> I'll re-post
>
> http://www.westernjournalism.com/?pag
???
I'll re-post
http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697
In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of
original birth certificate. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, Upon
application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the
director of health shall i
assuming his mother asked for a birth certificate after she registered him,
and why would she? I mean seriously, I don't get it. Do yo think a crack
team of forgers altered consensus reality or what?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have n
We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched,
examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude
that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for
proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal
or a signature are false
I have read it. Why do you think it's a lie?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Read it and tell me it's not a lie
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > why would factcheck lie? Seems like they have everything to lose and
> nothing
> > to gain by doing so...
> >
Read it and tell me it's not a lie
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> why would factcheck lie? Seems like they have everything to lose and nothing
> to gain by doing so...
>
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion communit
the canadian long form gives like the name of the doctor and maybe the time/
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> Well I don't know how it might relate to the U.S. but recently when getting
> my 1.5 yr old a passport to travel, the passport office required a long
> form
>
why would factcheck lie? Seems like they have everything to lose and nothing
to gain by doing so...
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> A Certification of Live Birth from 2007 is not the same as a birth
> certificate.
> The state of Hawaii did not accept it as proof of being native
*points*
Found one.
Cameron...you were saying something?
^_^
lol
2009/8/26 Sam :
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>>
>>> Sam wrote:
>>>
>>> He should have added that last sentence back in October. Not sure if
>>> they trust him at this point.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>> Sam wrote:
>>
>> He should have added that last sentence back in October. Not sure if
>> they trust him at this point.
>>
>
> See? You're a birther:
Another label to make me run away and cry.
> * absolutely mountains of proof that his is a
> Sam wrote:
>
> He should have added that last sentence back in October. Not sure if
> they trust him at this point.
>
See? You're a birther:
* absolutely mountains of proof that his is a citizen by witness, by
government decree, by circumstance, by logic
* zero evidence he's not.
Here's one
But you can if your parents lived in that city.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697
In 1982, the vital records law was amended to create a fifth kind of
original birth certificate. Under Act 182 H.B. NO. 3016-82, Upon
application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child,
He should have added that last sentence back in October. Not sure if
they trust him at this point.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> * "I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of
> Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the
Either way though, you can't get a birth cert that says you were born in a
city you weren't born in.
End of.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The long form has hospital and doctor. If home born you would need an
> exam by a doctor within a week or so. In 1961 you could mail in a
The long form has hospital and doctor. If home born you would need an
exam by a doctor within a week or so. In 1961 you could mail in a
claim of birth. That would be on the long form.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> Well I don't know how it might relate to the U.S. but
> gMoney wrote:
>
> "The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form
> birth certificate.
* "I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of
Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the
Hawaii State Department of Health verifying
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
> people making a big hulabaloo about this are just wankers.
Indeed.
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:21 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> "The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form
> birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes
> additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The
> short form is printed
Well I don't know how it might relate to the U.S. but recently when getting
my 1.5 yr old a passport to travel, the passport office required a long form
birth certificate. The long form b.c. had some additional info on it that
the short form didn't. If I remember correctly the long form had some
a
"The document is a 'certification of birth,' also known as a short-form
birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes
additional information such as birth weight and parents' hometowns. The
short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer
details.
A Certification of Live Birth from 2007 is not the same as a birth certificate.
The state of Hawaii did not accept it as proof of being native born
until after June 10, 2009.
Factcheck.org outright lied when they say they touched and
photographed the original birth certificate since the date on i
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Sam wrote:
> Nope. They just said they saw his original. Never confirmed what it
> said or even if he was born there.
> Nobody even knows which hospital he was born in.
You want to know what it saysread it yourself:
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> He has. And both the Hawaii secretary of state and the federal
> government have confirmed his proof.
Nope. They just said they saw his original. Never confirmed what it
said or even if he was born there.
Nobody even knows which hospital he
I will give you a pass on 'nutters', but how does it make them 'racist'?
Or is this one of those things where, because Obama is black, anything
negative said about him is automatically racist?
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>> Sam wrote:
>>
>> Birthers want Obama to prove h
> Sam wrote:
>
> Birthers want Obama to prove he was born in Hawaii.
He has. And both the Hawaii secretary of state and the federal
government have confirmed his proof.
So the birthers are indeed racist nutters.
Their goal is to prove he's a white republican named James Smith who
was born in c
> That reminds me, Kerry never did release his medical records even
> though he kept promising he would.
Well...then we would have proof he had the bolts on the side of his
neck surgically removed.
--
Scott Stroz
---
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those wh
Birthers want Obama to prove he was born in Hawaii.
Obama's team refuses and paints the birthers as loons. The longer they
ask for proof the longer people will believe the birthers are nutters
and tie them to the GOP.
The certification of live birth was not acceptable proof of Hawaiian
birth in H
Seems like your imaginary fight happened. You blacked out, then
magically remembered everything. Now nonsense ramblings. Sounds like
you did get hit and hard.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
>>That imaginary black out, or was it a punch in the face, the other
>>week really m
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> The liberals had to label them somehow.
I guess you have to create and legitimize a devil from nothing before
you can spend time attacking it and claiming to be a hero for it?
~~
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Vivec wrote:
> The term is on CNN, BBC World, MSNBC...CBS...all the news channels and
> Fox News had extensive coverage of it.
> And of course...the Daily Show :-)
>
> Where ya been?
Yeah I watch some of those. I guess when the radical nutjob show
comes on I tur
Add CBN, QVC and it's clones, and you've pretty much hit every network I
avoid like the plague.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> The term is on CNN, BBC World, MSNBC...CBS...all the news channels and
> Fox News had extensive coverage of it.
> And of course...the Daily Show :-)
The term is on CNN, BBC World, MSNBC...CBS...all the news channels and
Fox News had extensive coverage of it.
And of course...the Daily Show :-)
Where ya been?
2009/8/26 Cameron Childress :
>
> I had to look that sh*t up yesterday because I'd never heard the term
> "birthers" cept on this list.
>That imaginary black out, or was it a punch in the face, the other
>week really messed you up.
>
>Read your comment again and tell me you understand what you wrote:P
>
I'll give you a hint, I was being sarcastic. I know your mind has a real hard
time wrapping its head around anything more than
>That imaginary black out, or was it a punch in the face, the other
>week really messed you up.
>
>Read your comment again and tell me you understand what you wrote:P
>
um lets see that whole thread from last week was a practical joke played on the
community by those who attended CFUnited. It ne
The liberals had to label them somehow.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Dana wrote:
>> really? Kerry lost an election because he could not believe that people like
>> the swiftboaters existed. Just saying.
>
> I think I would put the
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Dana wrote:
> really? Kerry lost an election because he could not believe that people like
> the swiftboaters existed. Just saying.
I think I would put the "birthers" in the camp with moon landing
deniers, or maybe "dinosaurs roamed the earth 6000 years ago
creat
Kerry lost the election because a) he was a horrible choice for the
Democratic nominee and 2) the average US voter is a moron.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> really? Kerry lost an election because he could not believe that people like
> the swiftboaters existed. Just saying.
>
really? Kerry lost an election because he could not believe that people like
the swiftboaters existed. Just saying.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Dana wrote:
> > ok... that's five minutes of my life that I will never get back. I
>
That's what I said, but without the snark :)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Eh - I don't really think it's important to know folks like this are
> out there. And they only become important when we make them important
> by talking about them.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Dana wrote:
> ok... that's five minutes of my life that I will never get back. I *guess*
> it is important that there are people out there that think like this,
> butc'mon. Whether he is or is not proves nothing, and he is too smart to
> engage on the subject a
ok... that's five minutes of my life that I will never get back. I *guess*
it is important that there are people out there that think like this,
butc'mon. Whether he is or is not proves nothing, and he is too smart to
engage on the subject anyway.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Cameron Chil
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Vivec wrote:
> Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
> serious..but I can't help but crack up at these crackpots LOL!
This is a repost of a repost of a series of comments by a couple of
nut jobs. Not even really an article. The only peopl
That imaginary black out, or was it a punch in the face, the other
week really messed you up.
Read your comment again and tell me you understand what you wrote:P
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
>>Pretty boring.
>>
>>When someone of Dan Rather's stature claims forged documen
>Pretty boring.
>
>When someone of Dan Rather's stature claims forged documents are real
>on the evening news...
>we'll chat :P)
>
What about - how the federal government is steal the nation's precious bodily
fluids by putting floride in the water?
Or that the black helicopters are coming to ta
glachung!
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> You mean like Colin Powell at the UN?
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Pretty boring.
>>
>> When someone of Dan Rather's stature claims forged documents are real
>> on the evening news...
>> we'll chat :P)
~
Did Powell have forged documents at the UN?
By the way, we did chat about that way back when, where were you :)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> You mean like Colin Powell at the UN?
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>>
>> Pretty boring.
>>
>> When someone o
You mean like Colin Powell at the UN?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Pretty boring.
>
> When someone of Dan Rather's stature claims forged documents are real
> on the evening news...
> we'll chat :P)
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Vivec wrote:
>>
>> Hhahaha..
>>
>> Oh lo
:-I
2009/8/25 Sam :
>
> Pretty boring.
>
> When someone of Dan Rather's stature claims forged documents are real
> on the evening news...
> we'll chat :P)
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let t
Pretty boring.
When someone of Dan Rather's stature claims forged documents are real
on the evening news...
we'll chat :P)
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Hhahaha..
>
> Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
> serious..but I can't help but crack up at t
>Hhahaha..
>
>Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
>serious..but I can't help but crack up at these crackpots LOL!
>
>Now , they claim that if he was a citizen he would be circumcised.
>
>These people are so insecure and fearful that..heck it's darn funny.
>This could all
Huh?
You didn't see the comments that were reposted?
Did you visit the source sites and actually look at the further
comments on those?
Hilarious stuff man! Some people are really going off the deep end on
this stuff.
And..the site is part of a Blogging network that includes Engadget,
Lifehacke
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Hhahaha..
>
> Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
> serious..but I can't help but crack up at these crackpots LOL!
>
> Now , they claim that if he was a citizen he would be circumcised.
Uh, I didn't see that claim anyw
This is why I don't think everyone should be able to vote.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Hhahaha..
>
> Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
> serious..but I can't help but crack up at these crackpots LOL!
>
> Now , they claim that if he was a citizen h
LOL
>
> Hhahaha..
>
> Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
> serious..but I can't help but crack up at these crackpots LOL!
>
> Now , they claim that if he was a citizen he would be circumcised.
>
> These people are so insecure and fearful that..heck it's darn funny.
> T
Hhahaha..
Oh lordy..I know this isn't funny because these people are so
serious..but I can't help but crack up at these crackpots LOL!
Now , they claim that if he was a citizen he would be circumcised.
These people are so insecure and fearful that..heck it's darn funny.
This could all have been
67 matches
Mail list logo
