Re: no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-25 Thread Jerry Barnes
"Make people reevaluate the needs, demands and utility of government programs, the health of the economy, etc" This could happen with or without sunsetting. If tax rates were locked and needed to be changed, a new bill is introduced. Sunsetting would lead to same mess now with a bunch of posturi

Re: no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-24 Thread Judah McAuley
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > Remove the trickery.  Make all tax rate changes permanent until a bill > changes it.  It would make congressmen man up and stand beside their vote > since it is will not expire.  It would certainly make citizens more > interested in the proce

Re: no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-24 Thread Jerry Barnes
" The trickery behind the current sunsetting tax cuts is that it was a ruse to get around the "pay as you go" rules. Bush and Republicans had not intention of paying for the tax cuts and they obviously added a huge amount to the deficit, but they decided to do a work around to make it expire befor

Re: no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-24 Thread Judah McAuley
Since tax cuts normally happen during election years, I'd say that they are really the pandering cop out and that automatic sunsetting unless renewed makes more fiscal sense. The trickery behind the current sunsetting tax cuts is that it was a ruse to get around the "pay as you go" rules. Bush an

Re: no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-24 Thread Jerry Barnes
All tax cuts and tax increases should not have time limits. If a congressman wants to change the rate, it should be a new bill. The new rate will last until the next bill is passed that changes the rate. Temporary rate changes are a cop out. On 9/23/10, Judah McAuley wrote: > > Yup, bunch of

Re: no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-23 Thread Judah McAuley
Yup, bunch of spineless Democrats. They've internalized the Republican talking points to such a degree that they can't take a shit without 65 votes in the Senate. Judah On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > > Apparently Democrats have given up on the idea of extending any of the

no tax relief until after the election

2010-09-23 Thread Robert Munn
Apparently Democrats have given up on the idea of extending any of the tax cuts until after the election. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703384204575509793142421332.html Democrats abandoned plans to vote before Election Day on extending Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class while