>Well, on the upside, home-ec would come back.
>
Yes but do you want to learn to cook only that which is mentioned in the bible?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1
Well, on the upside, home-ec would come back.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> Um that's what I've been saying all the while. Creationism is a very
> specific fundamentalist Christian ideology. Its spawned intelligent design
> and the infamous Wedge Strategy. Lately they
Um that's what I've been saying all the while. Creationism is a very specific
fundamentalist Christian ideology. Its spawned intelligent design and the
infamous Wedge Strategy. Lately they've been trying to link up with
conservative Islam by sponsoring creationist and ID conferences in Saudi Ar
Larry,
Thank you! That's exactly the information I was asking about. We're
basically talking about a very specific ideology rather than a general
belief.
Michael
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> Creationism is a very strict idiotology. Signing the DI's pledge to follow
You can use the Discovery Institute's criteria. However looking at the
agreements And the pledges to follow Christian conservatism, I doubt many non
Christian fundamentalists would sign up.
>I cannot tell if you are being serious or playing Devil's Advocate.
>
>Do you really not know what the
Creationism is a very strict idiotology. Signing the DI's pledge to follow the
conservative Christian credo as espoused by the Discovery institute, would be
very much against most of the beliefs as advocated by Conservative and Orthodox
Judaism.
Again this list would be either very, very shor
>
> > it tends to accumulate around your penal gland.
Sweet. Does it make it noticeably bigger?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Arc
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> Evolution has nothing to do with atheism.
>
> Your reverse list should be those inventions developed by avowed creatinists,
> sorry Creationist in the last 100 years.
>
> I suspect that it will be a short if not zero length list.
Like I said
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Someone who believe that the universe and the earth and all life on it was
> created as described in the OT...it's the only definition I have ever heard.
But that simple definition covers myself and just about every
religious Jew. In other w
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> I cannot tell if you are being serious or playing Devil's Advocate.
Both.
> Do you really not know what the term "Creationist" means in terms of
> 21st Century American culture and politics?
I've seen the term used for a wide spread o
Not relevant to the discussion.
>Did you read the site name?
>
>On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Michael, your reverse list bears no resemblance in any way to the original
>> list.
>Why? If one list can be a stretch from point A to point B, why can't
>another list
ions
>made by people who were not atheists. I guess all atheists should
>avoid this list as it was made by believers who may well believe in a
>different version of creation than put forth by current science.
>
>
>
>>
>> If you are a creationist or have a similar belief set:
&
you mean there's a gland for jails?
>On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Medic wrote:
>
>>
>> This is great. In fact anyone that does believe in creationism... please DO
>> stop getting vaccines and drinking treated water. Please.
>>
>>
>>
>I do not receive vaccines, and drinking water is full of sh
Deer pee!
On 8/5/2011 8:44 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Doesn't spring water collect the toxic waste and other run-off that
> seeps into the water table?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusi
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Vivec wrote:
> Doesn't spring water collect the toxic waste and other run-off that
> seeps into the water table?
>
Depends on the source... Obviously if you live along the Hudson river i
wouldn't be drinking from any natural source due to PCB levels. As for
Sarat
Doesn't spring water collect the toxic waste and other run-off that
seeps into the water table?
On 5 August 2011 08:42, Casey Dougall wrote:
> You should be seriously worried about Fluoride intake as it tends to
> accumulate around your penal gland.
> http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-facts
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> This is great. In fact anyone that does believe in creationism... please DO
> stop getting vaccines and drinking treated water. Please.
>
>
>
I do not receive vaccines, and drinking water is full of shit including
Fluoride which is bad for you.
Y
Someone who believes men rode Dinosaurs and who thinks the world was
created in exactly 168 hours.
"The universe was created to reveal the love and mercy of God, and
life forms were created to be a blessing to one another and to God.
Life forms were created in approximately their current state, r
atheists should
> avoid this list as it was made by believers who may well believe in a
> different version of creation than put forth by current science.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Larry Lyons
> wrote:
> >
> > If you are a creationist or have a similar belief
ssage-
From: Jerry Milo Johnson [mailto:jmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:33 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: technologies you can no longer use
I cannot tell if you are being serious or playing Devil's Advocate.
Do you really not know what the term "Creationist&quo
, but used
natural forces to move things along and thus there is no conflict with
evolution.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:mdino...@houseoffusion.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: technologies you can no longer use
On Thu, Aug
On 8/4/2011 8:32 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> I cannot tell if you are being serious or playing Devil's Advocate.
>
> Do you really not know what the term "Creationist" means in terms of
> 21st Century American culture and politics?
>
> Does anyone else on the list have any question on the de
I cannot tell if you are being serious or playing Devil's Advocate.
Do you really not know what the term "Creationist" means in terms of
21st Century American culture and politics?
Does anyone else on the list have any question on the definition of that label?
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:28 PM,
> That is disingenuous of you Michael.
>
> You know exactly who the term "Creationist" applies to in this context.
Actually, I don't. I don't know if it only applies to those who
believe in 6000 (or so) actual days of existence or those who believe
that existence has a controlling force. I believ
That is disingenuous of you Michael.
You know exactly who the term "Creationist" applies to in this context.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Michael Dinowitz
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Vivec wrote:
>>
>> Other people's hypocrisy doesn't threaten the education of children.
> T
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> Other people's hypocrisy doesn't threaten the education of children.
They don't? I know of a hypocrisy that threatens the education of
hundreds of millions of people across the world.
> The root argument is that it shows that Creationists are eith
Other people's hypocrisy doesn't threaten the education of children.
The root argument is that it shows that Creationists are either plain
ignorant, or wilfully ignorant, of the science they claim to deny.
And no, Creationists do not get to claim that the Theory of Relativity is
correct in one i
Easiest answer around. Because someone will say that the results are
flawed. Nothing against the technology, everything against the
people's interpretation of the results and/or how the technology was
used to get the (flawed) results.
The root of the argument is that creationists are hypocrites.
Did you read the site name?
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
>
> Michael, your reverse list bears no resemblance in any way to the original
> list.
Why? If one list can be a stretch from point A to point B, why can't
another list be stretched as well?
>
> And where/how
If you don't believe that man can or should fly, because God didn't give him
wings...
Isn't it hypocritical for you to use an airplane?
So if you don't believe in the age of the Universe as science now defines it
because it doesn't match your interpretation of scripture, how can you glory
in the
atheists should
> avoid this list as it was made by believers who may well believe in a
> different version of creation than put forth by current science.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>>
>> If you are a creationist or have a similar belief set
wrote:
>
> If you are a creationist or have a similar belief set:
>
> http://canadianatheist.com/2011/08/03/technologies-you-can-no-longer-use/
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.
m/2011/08/03/technologies-you-can-no-longer-use/
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/g
If you are a creationist or have a similar belief set:
http://canadianatheist.com/2011/08/03/technologies-you-can-no-longer-use/
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp
34 matches
Mail list logo
