On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>> All along I thought
>> he was just smart knowing you can't throw a dart at a calendar to
>> determine when to pullout.
>
> He ahould have used the rhythm method..
"It really works!" says the
On May 28, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Sam wrote:
> All along I thought
> he was just smart knowing you can't throw a dart at a calendar to
> determine when to pullout.
He ahould have used the rhythm method..
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the
: cf-community
Subject: Re: the US votes for Billions for war, no money for Jobless
benefits
On 5/28/2010 7:08 AM, Casey Dougall wrote:
> If a large enough nucular bomb were to go off in the ocean, it could
> create a wave large enough to whip out all life on the planet.
>
I do not be
Silly me, not knowing Bush wanted a 100 year war. All along I thought
he was just smart knowing you can't throw a dart at a calendar to
determine when to pullout.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:17 PM, G Money wrote:
>>
>
> No, not those variables. You have to want to bring the troops home before
> y
"More of a 'I'll believe it when I see it' kinda thing. Sure, there's
supposedly a timetable set, but I'm not holding my breath waiting for the
troops to come home."
No doubt. I understand completely.
"The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." - Albert Camus
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> You mean the variables that prevented the previous admin from stating
> an absolute date?
>
No, not those variables. You have to want to bring the troops home before
you can start doing it. Bush...and if we'd have elected McCain...had no
intentio
You mean the variables that prevented the previous admin from stating
an absolute date?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Pretty good considering all the variables involved.
>
> Eric
~|
Order the Adobe
Pretty good considering all the variables involved.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 10:23 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the US votes for Billions for war, no money for Jobless
benefits
16 moths would be right about NOW
More of a "I'll believe it when I see it" kinda thing. Sure, there's
supposedly a timetable set, but I'm not holding my breath waiting for the
troops to come home.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Jerry Barnes wrote:
>
> "As I recall, he said he'd set a date to be out of Iraq--which he
> kinda
>As I recall, he said he'd set a date to be out of Iraq--which he kinda-sorta
>has done maybe, but that the action in Afghanistan was going to remain a
>priority, and probably be increased--which has certainly happened.
Ah, OK. I couldn't remember for sure what it was he had said.
~
"As I recall, he said he'd set a date to be out of Iraq--which he
kinda-sorta has done maybe,"
Don't be so assertive. Leave some room for doubt.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusi
16 moths would be right about NOW. How's that deadline going?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Exactly...he never said anything about pulling out of Afghanistan...he
> always stated that it was the right war and that Iraq was wrong and was
> going to set a time table to
, 2010 9:25 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the US votes for Billions for war, no money for Jobless
benefits
As I recall, he said he'd set a date to be out of Iraq--which he kinda-sorta
has done maybe, but that the action in Afghanistan was going to remain a
priority, and probably be incr
ssage-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:h...@ilsweb.com]
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 9:21 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the US votes for Billions for war, no money for Jobless
benefits
On 5/28/2010 7:08 AM, Casey Dougall wrote:
> If a large enough nucular bomb were to go off in the ocean, it coul
As I recall, he said he'd set a date to be out of Iraq--which he kinda-sorta
has done maybe, but that the action in Afghanistan was going to remain a
priority, and probably be increased--which has certainly happened.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Kris Sisk wrote:
>
> Wasn't one of Obama's ca
On 5/28/2010 7:08 AM, Casey Dougall wrote:
> If a large enough nucular bomb were to go off in the ocean, it could create
> a wave large enough to whip out all life on the planet.
>
I do not believe the ocean is large enough to create and sustain a
10,000 foot wave. Let alone a wave that wou
Wasn't one of Obama's campaign promises that he was going to bring our troops
home? Or was that just something people expected him to do because he was
percieved as the polar opposite of Bush?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Ant
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> So sad.
>
> There is enough money to make people's lives so much better.
> But it is being spent on war, military and other worthless things.
>
> Sometimes it seems we are in a self inflicted spiral to destruction.
> If the society that you are t
So sad.
There is enough money to make people's lives so much better.
But it is being spent on war, military and other worthless things.
Sometimes it seems we are in a self inflicted spiral to destruction.
If the society that you are trying to protect is falling apart...then
what are you spending
19 matches
Mail list logo
