Erika L. Walker wrote:
> Today it was normal fro me ... yesterday it had cool collider graphics ...
See them all...
http://www.google.com/holidaylogos.html
But it looks like they haven't archived yesterday's yet.
~|
Adobe® Cold
Today it was normal fro me ... yesterday it had cool collider graphics ...
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you see it today?
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > anyone see google.com today ? :)
> >
>
>
Did you see it today?
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone see google.com today ? :)
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Ge
anyone see google.com today ? :)
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusio
READY FOR WORK @ 12:50 pm
slacker.
-- tony
Better than a thousand hollow words, is one word that brings peace.
-- siddhartha gautama
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *crawls out from under bed*
>
> hmmm?
> we all still alive?
> No..warp holes and event horiz
*crawls out from under bed*
hmmm?
we all still alive?
No..warp holes and event horizons and stuff?
oh.
*sigh*
guess I should get ready for work then.
2008/9/10 Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Here's the problem: I don't think it self refreshes.
>
> I took a peek at the code and this
> gMoney wrote:
> That's awesome.
>
Here's the problem: I don't think it self refreshes.
I took a peek at the code and this was interesting:
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
dat
That's awesome.
I wonderdo they have a "Yep!" page ready to go, perhaps hosted on a
server on Jupiter
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:43 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >> Denny wrote:
> >> Synchronize your watches... 3... 2.. 1.
> >
> > If the black hole's expansion trav
Well, I think we all jumped the gun here...
The ultimate goal, planned for next month, is for beams of protons
circulating in opposite directions to be slammed into each other inside four
massive particle detectors.
They were just sending partials around the thing. Not trying to do the mash
up y
>> Denny wrote:
>> Synchronize your watches... 3... 2.. 1.
>
> If the black hole's expansion travels less than the speed of light you
> can watch the blackness expand here:
>
> http://webcast.cern.ch/index.html
Even better
http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/
~~
> Denny wrote:
> Synchronize your watches... 3... 2.. 1.
>
If the black hole's expansion travels less than the speed of light you
can watch the blackness expand here:
http://webcast.cern.ch/index.html
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 s
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> Cause it might be dangerous if ALL CF-COMM members created 2" spring
> driven cars and launched then at the exact same time as the hadron
> collider fires up.
>
> Whoa.
LOL!
Synchronize your watches... 3... 2.. 1.
In all seriousness, it
big non-event.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Erika wrote:
> According to the UK, the world is ending tomorrow...
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1051070/Landmark-experiment-unlock-secrets-Big-Bang-cause-end-world-say-scientists-court-bid-halt-it.html
>
> http://lhc-first-beam.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a more serious note...we're fed.
>
>
> http://www.joystiq.com/2008/09/09/terrible-news-gordon-freeman-spotted-near-large-hadron-collider/
>
>
lol,
Even better, who's the geek in front of him with his helmet strapped on like
On a more serious note...we're fed.
http://www.joystiq.com/2008/09/09/terrible-news-gordon-freeman-spotted-near-large-hadron-collider/
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get
Maybe we could just get everyone in China, India and Australia to jump
in the air at the same time as the collider starts up.
The Scientist(tm) paused for a moment as his coffee cup vibrated,
was the T-Rex was approaching again?
:-P
> Cause it might be dangerous if ALL CF-COMM members create
Gruss Gott wrote:
>> Gel wrote:
>> IT'S ALL GOING TO GO BWOOOM!!
>> AIEE!!!
>> *runs in circle with hands flailing in air*
>> AIEE
> Whoa.
But it would be interesting to look at all those there when the switch
is thrown. I would not be surprised if at least somebody doesn't flinch
> Gel wrote:
> IT'S ALL GOING TO GO BWOOOM!!
> AIEE!!!
> *runs in circle with hands flailing in air*
> AIEE
>
The car or the hadron thingy?
Cause it might be dangerous if ALL CF-COMM members created 2" spring
driven cars and launched then at the exact same time as the hadron
colli
Uh huh.
IT'S ALL GOING TO GO BWOOOM!!
AIEE!!!
*runs in circle with hands flailing in air*
AIEE
2008/9/9 Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Gel wrote:
>> It's actually interesting, because we don't know.
>> Those scientists that are doing this do not actually kn
> Gel wrote:
> It's actually interesting, because we don't know.
> Those scientists that are doing this do not actually know what will happen.
>
But they do know this: nature is capable of creating proton collisions
at energies billions of times more powerful than our dinky 17 mile
radius man-made
Larry Lyons wrote:
>> So yeah we don't know, maybe this will lead to the earth becoming
>> sentient. (pi points for obscure Science Fiction reference)
>>
>
> Earth by David Brin? He uses a similar mechanism in that book.
Larry gets the pi^googole points. (Forgot to type the power last tim
>Vivec wrote:
>> But they could never say , "We definitely know what is going to
>> happen" because if they did, they would not need to perform these
>> experiments.
>
>I like this to the concerns some scientist had about the testing of the
>first nuclear explosive. There was some fear that it w
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:13 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: who cares about the election, we don't need it ...
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vivec wrote:
> So yeah we don't know, maybe this will lead to the earth becoming
> sentient. (pi points for obscure Science Fiction reference)
I don't know the reference, but this does remind me of a movie plot
where a huge
That would be bad.
Because the obvious response of the planet would be to f*** us up :)
2008/9/9 Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So yeah we don't know, maybe this will lead to the earth becoming
> sentient. (pi points for obscure Science Fiction reference)
~~~
Vivec wrote:
> But they could never say , "We definitely know what is going to
> happen" because if they did, they would not need to perform these experiments.
I like this to the concerns some scientist had about the testing of the
first nuclear explosive. There was some fear that it would ignit
It's actually interesting, because we don't know.
Those scientists that are doing this do not actually know what will happen.
They don't think, or may feel it is a far fetched notion, that there
could be a rip in time,
or some cascade effect like a nuclear explosion resulting.
But they could neve
That's kick ass!
I'm going to quit making my mortgage payments.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> According to the UK, the world is ending tomorrow...
>
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1051070/Landmark-experiment-unlock-secrets-Big
According to the UK, the world is ending tomorrow...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1051070/Landmark-experiment-unlock-secrets-Big-Bang-cause-end-world-say-scientists-court-bid-halt-it.html
http://lhc-first-beam.web.cern.ch/lhc-first-beam/Welcome.html
~~~
This article keeps saying "scientists" (plural), and "they", but only
mentioned one person by name. The guy who's objecting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_R%C3%B6ssler
"A majority of experts in these fields dismissed his claims as
substantial misconceptions of the general theory of relativity
If you mean Nostradamus...the answer is undoubtedly "yes". His "predictions"
were so vague and nonsensical, that people can connect just about anything
to him.
In fact, he predicted I would post this..
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, whats the cf-comm
yeah, whats the cf-comm take on this thing?
bunk? real? what? not the existence of that thing
they are building, but the worry associated with it.
also, does this year, or this date have any correlation
with that freak who used to predict stuff years ago?
-- tony
Better than a thousand hollow wo
32 matches
Mail list logo
