we aren't referring to tages, just to elements. Does that still really jar?
On 2/12/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't like saying "We're going to write this novel in german, but we're
> foregoing the umlaut"
>
> On 2/12/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > thanks ever
Isn't like saying "We're going to write this novel in german, but we're
foregoing the umlaut"
On 2/12/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thanks everyone. The final decisiosn was lower case and bullets so it
> looks less wierd. She Who Must Be Obeyed had previously decided
> against the < >
>
thanks everyone. The final decisiosn was lower case and bullets so it
looks less wierd. She Who Must Be Obeyed had previously decided
against the < >
I appreciate the brainpower devoted to this issue ;)
Dana
On 2/12/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I'd write:
>
> is an XML tag
I think I'd write:
is an XML tag.
<...book> is an XML attribute.
But that's just me.
--Ben
Dana wrote:
> If you are writing about an xml tag that is lower case (say book) and
> it begins a sentence, could you capitalize it? Word wants to of
> course, but you can over-ride that sure. Beyond tha
nada.
and it has bitten me in the arse a coupla times.
tw
On 2/12/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> XML is case sensitive? I thought XML would be case independent, and it
> would depend on whatever environment you are using to decipher the data?
>
> LikeXML would be case sensitive
XML is case sensitive? I thought XML would be case independent, and it
would depend on whatever environment you are using to decipher the data?
LikeXML would be case sensitive in C#, but not in Cold Fusion?
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you are writing about an xml
use of < > has been decided against, but good point.
Dana
On 2/9/07, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that you always want to refer to it in the tag form such as
>
> " tags are used to separate content"
>
> so capitalization shouldn't be an issue.
>
> On 2/9/07, Dana
so accuracy that looks wierd...ya I guess I did
On 2/9/07, William Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > lowercase. But xml is case sensitive so Book would be a completely
> > different tag.
>
> I think you answered your own question
>
> ;-)
> --
> will
>
> "If my life weren't funny, it would just
> lowercase. But xml is case sensitive so Book would be a completely
> different tag.
I think you answered your own question
;-)
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
I would think that you always want to refer to it in the tag form such as
" tags are used to separate content"
so capitalization shouldn't be an issue.
On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you are writing about an xml tag that is lower case (say book) and
> it begins a sentence, cou
If you are writing about an xml tag that is lower case (say book) and
it begins a sentence, could you capitalize it? Word wants to of
course, but you can over-ride that sure. Beyond that it looks wierd
lowercase. But xml is case sensitive so Book would be a completely
different tag. Has anyone run
11 matches
Mail list logo