There was a good discussion about this on "The News Hour" yesterday and one
of the points made was that not only were the stories controversial in
general they were also controversial within "The Times".
Apparently most of the stories came from a single reporter who was a
favorite of the editor at
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: wtf. NY Times apolgises for invalid war coverage.
> "ver the last year this newspaper has shone the bright light of
> hindsight on decisions that led the U
Yes. I was very glad to see them step up and say so.
Dana
>"ver the last year this newspaper has shone the bright light of
>hindsight on decisions that led the United States into Iraq. We have
>examined the failings of American and allied intelligence, especially on
>the issue of Iraq's weapons a
"ver the last year this newspaper has shone the bright light of
hindsight on decisions that led the United States into Iraq. We have
examined the failings of American and allied intelligence, especially on
the issue of Iraq's weapons and possible Iraqi connections to
international terrorists. We ha
