Ann Arbor Java Users Group (www.aajug.org) SUN Top 25 JUG
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Dinowitz)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Jobs-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mindseye test
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 10:37:41 -0400
Two weeks or so back Raymond posted a job offer from
Stephen Milligan
Code poet for hire
http://www.spike.org.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Dinowitz
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:04 AM
To: CF-Jobs-Talk
Subject: Re: Mindseye test
Actually, I've found
-Jobs-Talk
Subject: Re: Mindseye test
Actually, I've found through testing that looping over a list
is faster than doing so for an array, especially when you take
the listtoarray() conversion time into account. Also, why not
create a virtual query and do a QofQ rather than using a real
table
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Dinowitz)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Jobs-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mindseye test
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 10:37:41 -0400
Two weeks or so back Raymond posted a job offer from the company he
worked
with
that included a test. If anyone took
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil
Robertson-Ravo [Team Macromedia]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 8:14 AM
To: CF-Jobs-Talk
Subject: Re: Mindseye test
keep your mind fresh ;-)
Stephen Milligan wrote:
Can you share the code that caused you to come to that conclusion?
In every speed
