OK, we have (finally) solved our error and I thought I would share the
lesson we learned with the group. The underlying problem was being masked by
CF restarting by itself. We had "Restart when requests terminate abnormally"
turned on, but when we turned it off the true error started showing up:
2
Title: include vs custom tag
well,
we would probably use cfmodule instead of the custom tags if custom tags win
this discussion, so I'm not really worried about that part. your viewpoints on
using cfmodule instead of cfinclude however are interesting.
-Original Message-From: Glenn
Title: include vs custom tag
I'm
not changing fusebox. We're creating our own framework. We're changing the
overall idea behind fusebox.
-Original Message-From: Matt Jones
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
11:08 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusi
Title: include vs custom tag
I've
built some substantially huge CF sites, and using instead of
wherever you can is critical. Execution time is probably
not the key issue, really, it's development time. If you can build the
site more reliably, faster, and cheaper, a half millisecond per p
Title: include vs custom tag
what
version of fusebox are you changing?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003
11:11 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
[KCFusion] include vs custom tag
I'll
leave the answer c
Title: include vs custom tag
I'll
leave the answer currently to simply changing the basic idea of fusebox with all
the action based includes, to using action based custom tag calls
instead.
-Original Message-From: Adaryl Wakefield
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 0
Title: include vs custom tag
Curious. If you have time, can you explain what you
mean exactly when you say you are going to use custom tags for the framework?
A.
- Original Message -
From:
Dunwiddie, Bruce
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:29
Title: include vs custom tag
I'm
seeing it on one of our test servers as .5 ms avg to run an include, and 1 ms to
run a custom tag. Can anyone else verify that the custom tag would take about
twice the time?
-Original Message-From: Dunwiddie, Bruce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:
Title: include vs custom tag
We're still using cf 4.5 sp2. We're currently having a disagreement about whether to define our new framework for a site based on custom tags for each page basically, or the same thing using includes instead. I personally think the custom tags are a complete necess
