Re: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval

2001-06-06 Thread Durgesh Parmar
I have n't had a chance yet to look at version 5 but it will be useful to know what you think of it. Bryan LaPlante wrote: Is anyone else in our group evaluating or currently using CF 5? I have got some examples I would like to share with you about getting tons of user defined functions to

RE: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval

2001-06-06 Thread Bakken, Kory
We are planning an upgrade next week as soon as we get the upgrade delivered. I would be glad to be of assistance if you still need it by then. Kory Bakken -Original Message- From: Bryan LaPlante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 1:18 AM To: [KCFusion List]

RE: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval

2001-06-06 Thread Ron Hornbaker
The notion of loading a group of functions using cfinclude at the top of ever template that requires access to said functions, well I am thinking it's too heavy. go download http://www.netwebapps.com/projects/cflp.zip this zip file while I go get my coffee and I will explain what I have done

Re: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval

2001-06-06 Thread Daryl Banttari
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:13 PM Subject: Re: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval Ok loading 126 functions in 4 libraries with the custom tags in the application.cfm file. CF_STRLIB SCOPE=session CF_Datamanipulation SCOPE=session CF_MATHLIB SCOPE=session CF_SecurityLib SCOPE=session

Re: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval

2001-06-06 Thread Daryl Banttari
a bubble sort in an interpreted language like CF. Custom tags calls have very little additional overhead vs. cfincludes. Daryl - Original Message - From: Ron Hornbaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:23 PM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] CF5 Eval Ok