Hello,
Some tide effects on sea surface heights elevations are captured by:
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_earth_tide
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_equilibrium_ocean_tide
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_geocentric_ocean_tide
It would seem that the two conflicting requirements, which I'll
caricature as rigorous version control and pragmatic usability,
could go some way to being reconciled by using term-specific version
numbers.
Instead of:
some_prefix/cf_vocab_number/term (e.g.
.../P071/16/CFSN0023)
Or:
Mohamed, do any of the names suggested below meet your needs?
-Jeff DLB
On 2010-12-17 04:06, Lauret Olivier wrote:
Some tide effects on sea surface heights elevations are captured by:
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_earth_tide
Hello Jeff,
I have asked our senior scientist which one to use to describe the
predicted water level and he suggested that we use:
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_equilibrium_ocean_tide
Thank you all very much,
Mohamed
On 12/17/2010 12:32 PM, Jeff deLaBeaujardiere wrote:
Mohamed, do
On 12/17/10 9:32 AM, Jeff deLaBeaujardiere wrote:
Mohamed, do any of the names suggested below meet your needs?
Some tide effects on sea surface heights elevations are captured by:
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_earth_tide
sea_surface_height_amplitude_due_to_equilibrium_ocean_tide
While I appreciate the argument that having a single unique string to represent
each concept in earth science would be ideal, I can promise that no matter what
we do with versioning of terms, in 10 years there will be a plethora of URIs
representing any given concept (more or less). Hate to
While I appreciate the argument that having a single unique string to represent
each concept in earth science would be ideal, I can promise that no matter what
we do with versioning of terms, in 10 years there will be a plethora of URIs
representing any given concept (more or less). Hate to
