Hi Corey,
> On 30/03/12 15:01, Corey Bettenhausen wrote:
> > To the CF group in general, how can I help to introduce groups into
> > the CF conventions? And also extend CF to HDF5? What's the first
> > step I need to take?
>
> My experience is that coming up with a proposal or two is a good star
Ah, I think I see - you're using 'institution' the way 'station' or
'cast' might be used
in a collection of feature types. Do all the possible instance
variables (station, profile...)
need to have standard names, too?
I think what's confusing to some of us is that the concept of
coordinates
On 30/03/12 15:01, Corey Bettenhausen wrote:
> To the CF group in general, how can I help to introduce groups into
> the CF conventions? And also extend CF to HDF5? What's the first
> step I need to take?
My experience is that coming up with a proposal or two is a good start,
as it will often get
Mike, thanks for response. I agree with all of your points.
My suggestion to inch CF towards supporting netCDF4 files with data only in the
root group was simply to get the process started. Baby steps.
To the CF group in general, how can I help to introduce groups into the CF
conventions? And a
Dear All,
In February Richard Hattersley pointed out that a number of standard names had
trailing white space in the XML version of the standard name table:
atmosphere_moles_of_acetic_acid
atmosphere_moles_of_alpha_hexachlorocyclohexane
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of_nitrogen_monoxid
Hi all,
Even if the missing aux coordinate values never will be found, I think
there is legitimate uses of data where some of the aux coordinate values
are missing where data values exist. For example if you want to compute
the average of data variables, you do not need the aux coordinate vari
