Hi Andreas, et al,
All the std_names seem to follow existing patterns.
As mentioned in my previous email, I think the units should be mol/m2 for
consistency.
Best wishes,
Philip
---
Dr Philip Cameron-Smith, p...@llnl.
Hi All,
All of the std_names that count atoms and molecules currently have canonical
units that use moles and meters, so I would want to continue that.
I had not realized that udunits did not include molecules.
To the udunits experts: How hard is it to add 'molecules' permanently, using
the
Dear Cecelia
> is it codified that
> recommendations should generate warnings in tools if they are not
> followed? (I assume the mixed calendar itself would not be
> deprecated, just its use as the default?)
I don't think it's codified, but that's what the CF checker does. Requirements
and recom
Dear Andreas and Martin
I agree with Martin that if layers can be defined numerically these numerical
limits should not appear in the standard_name. The usual way to do it would
be with a coordinate variable (either with a dimension of size 1, or a scalar
coordinate variable) whose bounds specify
