hello all:
As a proposal:
Would
time_sample_interval
work for this as a generic standard name
On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Cameron-smith, Philip wrote:
> Hi Aleksander,
>
> I used 'repeat' to capture the concept that the interval is from one
> measurement until the time the measurement is
Hi Aleksander,
I used 'repeat' to capture the concept that the interval is from one
measurement until the time the measurement is repeated (in the same location)
I can imagine many other types of intervals, eg interval between measurement at
wavelength1 and wavelength2 when using a filter wheel
Hi Philip,
> time_repeat_interval_due_to_collocation
What is "repeat" in the name for? Can you quickly clarify that please?
-Aleksandar
___
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadat
Hi Alexsandar,
My initial instinctive guess at the meaning of time_interval was that it would
be the time interval over which a measurement was averaged (which CF has other
means for encoding). My second guess was that it was encoding the time between
one observation in a time series and the ne
Bruno,
Given solar_azimuth_angle parallels this definition pretty closely, would you
be OK with the originally proposed name if the definition is clear?
john
On Jan 15, 2013, at 09:28, Bruno PIGUET wrote:
> Aleksandar,
>
> Thank-you for the clarification. As John said, with the diagram,
> e
Aleksandar,
Thank-you for the clarification. As John said, with the diagram,
everything becomes clear.
But I fear I have no good suggestion on the way to name this
parameter. Spontaneously, I would say something like
"azimuth_of_sensor_seen_from_observed_point", but, clearly, this doesn't
f
Great questions, John, glad you've started this conversation!
We're using the platform terms for some of the variables from
current meters and profilers deployed on surface moorings, so
our needs may be different from the satellite people.
Personally, I'd like to see the 'orientation' standard na
Dear All,
The standard name table has been updated today on the CF website
(http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/documents/cf-standard-names). The current version is
now version 21 dated 12 January 2013. The changes have also been published on
the NERC vocabulary server. Full details of the changes are giv
Dear All,
I totally agree with Heiko's words of caution. In my experience (over 30 years
of oceanographic data management) duplicated information inevitably leads to
inconsistent information.
Cheers, Roy.
Please note that I now work part-time from Tuesday to Thursday. E-mail
response on oth
Hello Aleksandar,
I've seen some files which did such duplication, even if they haven't
been CF-compliant. If it doesn't need to be machine-readable, you can
put that information where-ever you want and you don't need a
standard_name for that.
But I can only give a warning for duplication: T
10 matches
Mail list logo
