Re: [CF-metadata] can a cell method be an attribute of an auxiliary coordinate variable ?

2014-03-05 Thread rho...@excaliburlabs.com
Dear Jonathan: Your recommendation of changing the cell method name from the standard_name to area is analogous to the recommendation you provided me at the start of this message thread. In para 7.3.4 (Cell methods when there are no coordinates). the first sentence is: To provide an

[CF-metadata] can a cell method be an attribute of an auxiliary coordinate variable ?

2014-03-05 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Randy The usual choice would be the standard_name to refer to variation over an axis for which there is no netCDF dimension. area is provided as a special shorthand for the *combination* of horizontal axes. The advantage of it is that you don't have specify what these might be e.g. longitude

Re: [CF-metadata] can a cell method be an attribute of an auxiliary coordinate variable ?

2014-03-05 Thread Jim Biard
Jonathan, Regarding using area vs latitude or longitude, I was following the third paragraph of section 7.3.4: … For longitude, the domain is indicated according to this provision by the string longitude (rather than the name of a longitude coordinate variable), and this implies that the

Re: [CF-metadata] can a cell method be an attribute of an auxiliary coordinate variable ?

2014-03-05 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Jim Regarding using area vs latitude or longitude, I was following the third paragraph of section 7.3.4: ? For longitude, the domain is indicated according to this provision by the string longitude (rather than the name of a longitude coordinate variable), and this implies that the

[CF-metadata] new standard name requests

2014-03-05 Thread Bedka, Kristopher M. (LARC-E302)[SCIENCE SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, INC]
All: Are we considering the following standard name final for the effective cloud height parameter we had been discussing? I have not heard any dissent in recent weeks and I need to get this integrated into my files ASAP. Kris From: Bedka, Kristopher