Hello all,
Many thanks for the replies. It seems there is only support for the
case that ancillary variable dimensions must be a subset of their
parent variable dimensions (treating scalar coordinate variables like
size 1 coordinate variables for the sake of a snappier sentence - oh,
that's blown
Hi David:
At the risk of giving more useful answers to the wrong question, i will say
that we could do something other than require ancillary or coordinate
variables to only have dimensions that the parent variable has. There just
must be a simple and explicit rule for mapping between parent and
Hi John,
this is a bit of a tangent, but you state:
"Another possible use case is to represent contiguous bounds, where
lower_bounds(i+1) == upper_bounds(i), then one only needs n+1 values
instead of 2*n."
I seem to recall this option in CF, but recently I was reviewing the
bounds
Karl,
This is not in CF. There is a statement that many assume that bounds are
at the midpoints between coordinate values, but it then points out that
this is not a convention. That's as close as it gets. If it was there in
the past it is gone now.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 12/22/15 12:07
Thanks, Jim.
Glad that my edit "find" skills haven't deteriorated too much.
best,
Karl
On 12/22/15 9:10 AM, Jim Biard wrote:
Karl,
This is not in CF. There is a statement that many assume that bounds
are at the midpoints between coordinate values, but it then points out
that this is not a
