Re: [CF-metadata] New standard names for OMIP biogeochemistry and chemistry

2016-10-21 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Hello John, I'm getting a little confused here. Why is the dimensionality of the surface measurement different? I would have expected it to be something like mol m-3 for concentrations at any depth. Or am I misunderstanding what you wish to describe? Cheers, Roy. Please note that I partial

[CF-metadata] New area_types for LUMIP subgrid land-use tile reporting

2016-10-21 Thread David Lawrence
LUMIP is requesting subgrid output on four land-use tiles (primary_and_secondary_land, crops, pastures, and urban). area_types for crops and pasture are already defined in the existing cf-conventions. New area_types required: *primary_and_secondary_land* - all primary and secondary vegetation th

Re: [CF-metadata] New standard names for OMIP biogeochemistry and chemistry

2016-10-21 Thread John Dunne - NOAA Federal
Units are the same. It's like Jonathan and Allison said, we wanted to request both the topmost layer values in 2D as well as the full 3D values as a lower priority, and tried to use the "so" versus "sos" implementation as a template. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Lowry, Roy K. wrote: > Hello

Re: [CF-metadata] New standard names for OMIP biogeochemistry and chemistry

2016-10-21 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
Hi John, Thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Roy. Please note that I partially retired on 01/11/2015. I am now only working 7.5 hours a week and can only guarantee e-mail response on Wednesdays, my day in the office. All vocabulary queries should be sent to enquir...@bodc.ac.uk. Please a