Dear Karl,
I can see your concern, and clearly we do have to draw a line somewhere. We
currently have 856 terms using the "due_to" construction. The temperature
change variables you refer to can only be calculated by multiple runs of a full
climate model, and I agree that it is not appropriate
Hi again,
I think all you need for the second Standard Name is:
moles_of_silicate_per_unit_area_in_seabed_sediment
as there is one atom of silicon per molecule of any of the species making up
'silicate'. You only really need 'expressed_as_silicon' for 'mass_of_silicate'.
Cheers, Roy.
I a
Great :-) . Then I would like to propose the following two new standard
names:
moles_of_nitrogen_per_unit_area_in_seabed_sediment
unit: mol/m2
description: moles_of_X_per_unit_area_in_Y describes the amount of X in
a column with unity base area of material/compartment Y. 'Sediment'
means
Dear Jonathan,
Yes, it should be 0C, not 0K.
I don't think the approach you suggest will work because what we need is the
depth of the first 0C isotherm assuming surface temperature above 0C. We don't
want the depth of the 0C isotherm in regions where the surface temperature is <
0C. I can't
Dear Martin
All the change_over_time ones look fine to me, thanks.
> 2.1 dmltDepth to soil thaw [m] (CliC)
> Depth from surface to the zero degree isotherm. Above this isotherm T > 0o,
> and below this line T < 0o.
>
> When the surface temperature is above 0K and there is frozen soil at som
Dear All,
Following some discussion with Hyungjun, I'd like to propose the following new
standard names to support the LS3MIP CMIP6 data request.
1.Changes over time
1.1 dcwChange in Interception Storage [kg m-2]
The standard name “canopy_water_amount” exists.
+ Propose: change_over_ti
Hi all,
Thanks to everyone making the push to get all the names defined for
CMIP6. Alison, who must be working close to full time on this, deserves
special recognition.
best wishes,
Karl
On 5/17/18 7:41 AM, Alison Pamment - UKRI STFC wrote:
Dear All,
The standard name and area type table
Dear Alison, Martin, and all
On the last point commented on by Martin:
"4.3-4.7 Perturbed radiation calculations"
I wonder if it is wise to assign a new name every time experiment
conditions change. I would limit names to quantities that are
calculated independently by a physics model or tha
Dear All,
The standard name and area type tables have both been updated. The standard
name table is now at Version 52 and the area type table is at Version 8, both
dated 16 May 2018. The standard name changes have also been published on the
NERC Vocabulary Server and the area type changes will
Hi Daniel,
That works for me.
Cheers, Roy.
I am retiring on 31/05/2018 but will continue to be active through an Emeritus
Fellowship using this e-mail address.
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Daniel
Neumann
Sent: 17 May 2018 10:41
To: CF Metadata Mail Li
Dear Jonathan,
Of the options you suggest, I think "minus_tendency_" is the neatest, being
more compact that "minus_one_times_tendency_" without, as far as I can see,
introducing any ambiguity.
I had a look on-line for antonyms of tendency, and discovered that our usage of
"tendency" as an a
Dear Alison,
Thanks .. some answers and comments below. I've copied Yves Balkanski in to
comment on the dust deposition parameters (4.1-4.2) [Yves, this discussion is
trying clarify the definition of parameters depdust anf sedustCI, and to define
appropriate standard names for these variables]
Dear Roy, Dear Jonathan,
Thank you for the feedback. I see that sediment might be ambiguous.
Would "seabed sediment" or "marine seabed sediment" be an acceptable
alternative?
moles_of_nitrogen_per_unit_area_in_seabed_sediment
This would clarify that the sea floor is meant as location of t
Dear Jonathan,
Whilst that is one meaning of the word 'sediment', it is not the only one. The
word is also used to describe the material collected by coring the seabed or
filtering muddy waters which is then analysed for many chemical and biological
substances. We have a lot of this kind of da
14 matches
Mail list logo
