Cecelia
I support 1) mostly for backward compatibility. I would also strongly
encourage but not demand that users change their base dates to after 1800
when it makes sense to do so.
And, I (again) want to make sure that LTMs and their time values are
addressed before any decisions are made as to
, Cathy Smith (NOAA Affiliate) wrote:
Cecelia
I support 1) mostly for backward compatibility. I would also strongly
encourage but not demand that users change their base dates to after
1800
when it makes sense to do so.
And, I (again) want to make sure that LTMs and their time values
Jonathon
We have the issue that we store many long terms means (subdaily,daily,
monthly...). These long terms means have no years per se though the
rest of the date is an actual 'date'. We have been storing them as year
1 generally speaking (usually base 1-1-1) as we want to avoid using a
date
John
There is some meteorological data that is available pre-Gregorian
calendar (paleo data, some temperature datasets) and of course there are
other scientific fields where data is pre-1500 (e.g. astronomy,
archeology) . Given that netCDF files with data dates spanning ~1550 probably
already
