, Philip [mailto:cameronsmi...@llnl.gov]
Sent: 23 September 2010 19:48
To: Pierre Friedlingstein; Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,SSTD)
Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] CMIP5 carbon cycle standard names
Hi Pierre,
Sorry for causing confusion.
I understood that the question
Message-
From: cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-
boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Pierre Friedlingstein
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 6:01 AM
To: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CMIP5 carbon cycle standard names
Alison
CentreFax: +44 1235 446314
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Email: alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Friedlingstein [mailto:p.friedlingst...@exeter.ac.uk]
Sent: 21 September 2010 16:41
To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,SSTD
Hi Alison,
Just wondering, why are the first two variables below named as
tendency_of_atmosphere_mass_content_of...
while all others are named as surface_upward_mass_flux_of_ ...
Any reason ?
I know the tendency... is used for other chemical species... But here
for CO2 variables, I think
Again, OK for me.
On 17/09/2010 13:26, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Sorry, one other one which Pierre didn't remark on. This name is rather
obscure, even bizarre :-)
miscellaneous_living_compartments_carbon_content
I wonder if we could convey this meaning any more plainly? What about
