cgd.ucar.edu
> [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of
> Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 08 August 2011 09:40
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] [FRANCE] Question about CF Convention
>
> Dear John et al
>
> > The actual CF conve
Dear John et al
> The actual CF convention says "should", im not sure why
> **http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/conformance/requirements-and-recommendations/1.5/
> says "must".
My reading is that "should" and "must" mean the same and that the convention,
as it stands, requires CF-netCDF files to have the
On 8/3/2011 8:31 AM, Mazurier Alain wrote:
Hi all,
I am new on this mailing list and I hope my question is not so obvious
My problem is with:
*At the adress :
*http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/conformance/requirements-and-recommendations/1.5/
I find
*« 2.1 Filename*
*Requirements:*
* Filename
t to, i.e. I should not kill anyone (I use this as
an example of how strongly "should" could be regarded as obligatory,
rather than my homicidal tendencies :-)
Hope this helps, though I am sure others will also comment.
Salut,
Glenn
------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 3
should" could be regarded as obligatory,
rather than my homicidal tendencies :-)
Hope this helps, though I am sure others will also comment.
Salut,
Glenn
------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:31:11 +0200
From: "Mazurier Alain"
Subject: [CF-metadata] [FRANCE
Hi all,
I am new on this mailing list and I hope my question is not so obvious
My problem is with:
At the adress :
http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/conformance/requirements-and-recommendations/1.5/ I
find
« 2.1 Filename
Requirements:
* Filename must have ".nc" suffix."
But If I read
