Hi, John!
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:27 AM, john caron wrote:
> It appears that d0 is a time dimension? If so, CF would require a time
> coordinate for it.
I don't know its precise physical meaning but the real interesting
part is that lat/lon positions are recorded in 3-D array since most
EOS
It appears that d0 is a time dimension? If so, CF would require a time
coordinate for it. In any case, its necessary to distinguish between "CF
compliant" and "able to be georeferenced by generic programs using CF
metadata". The latter is more stringent, and at the moment i dont think
your data
Thanks, Karl! Maybe, I think it's good to mention this possibility
in the CF document: coordinate variables can be arbitrary n-Dimension
arrays where n > 1.
Regarding the 3rd dimension, the 3-D lat/lon coordinate variables
have dimension names like below.
447 (Number of HourBoxes) x 3 (1.0
Hi,
This file looks CF-compliant to me. I don't think it has to be 2-d.
Like John Caron, I am mildly curious what the 3-dimensions represent.
regards,
Karl
On 05-Mar-10 12:30 PM, H. Joe Lee wrote:
Hi,
I have a satellite data that stores lat / lon information in 3-D
array and I'm wonder
what does the 3rd dimension represent ?
On 3/5/2010 1:30 PM, H. Joe Lee wrote:
Hi,
I have a satellite data that stores lat / lon information in 3-D
array and I'm wondering how such data can meet the CF convention.
Following the
http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/documents/cf-conventions/1.4/ch05s0
Hi,
I have a satellite data that stores lat / lon information in 3-D
array and I'm wondering how such data can meet the CF convention.
Following the
http://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/documents/cf-conventions/1.4/ch05s02.html
page example convention, here's the description of my data:
