Dear Vegard
Regarding your point (1), confidence. Could you say more precisely what you
mean by "correctness"? I don't really understand the idea here, or in (3)
where you use it. I am wondering if we could describe by some means other
than a standard name modifier, since those appear to be proble
Hi, all!
The cf metadata standard lacks specifications for dealing with probabilities.
To amend this, we would like to propose the following additions to the cf
metadata standard. This proposal is largely based on an old discussion on this
list, from 2011. The discussion is in the archive, with
Dear all
> Yes, I was confused by this for a while this morning too, because I
> haven't coded the CF Checker to allow a modifier called "count"
> either.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong but I'm assuming that the term
> "count" refers to the modifier called "|number_of_observations".|
Sorry for
ecause there is no bounds attribute pointing to them. They look like data
variables.
Best wishes
Jonathan
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:48:21AM -0800, Karl Taylor wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:48:21 -0800
From: Karl Taylor
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
Dear Jonathan and all,
*> I think it is wrong to add a "bounds" attribute to a formula term
attached to a vertical coordinate. Only the coordinate itself
should have a bounds attribute.
The CF standard doesn't clarify that. It doesn't say whether formula terms
can have bounds, or whether bound
On 24/02/11 13:21, Michael Decker wrote:
Hi all,
* If the standard_name attr contains the "count" modifier, the quantity is
dimensionless. The checker should take standard_name modifiers into account
(Appendix C) as well as the canonical units from the standard name table
(and the cell_methods)
Hi all,
> * If the standard_name attr contains the "count" modifier, the quantity is
> dimensionless. The checker should take standard_name modifiers into account
> (Appendix C) as well as the canonical units from the standard name table
> (and the cell_methods) when deciding what units a quantity
Dear Karl et al.
I think there are several separate points here!
* If the standard_name attr contains the "count" modifier, the quantity is
dimensionless. The checker should take standard_name modifiers into account
(Appendix C) as well as the canonical units from the standard name table
(and the
Dear Brian
> As an aside though, I do think there would be value in having the CF
> checker be made to recognize when variables are part of the definition of a
> dimensionless vertical coordinate via the formula_terms attribute. In the
> example below, there are two variables called out by formul
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:48:21AM -0800, Karl Taylor wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:48:21 -0800
From: Karl Taylor
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
To: Kyle Olivo
CC: aparna Radhakrishnan,
"cf-metadata@cgd.uca
Dear all (and Christina in particular),
if you'd like to get a second oppinion, please try the Juelich CF checker.
You can either access it "graphically" through
http://ogc-interface.icg.kfa-juelich.de:50080/upload (Browse for a file, click
"Upload" and then click on the "log" button in the
Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 06:17:01PM +, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> >>>Dear Karl et al
> >>>
> >>>To me it looks like the checker couldn't tell that they were bounds
> >>>variables,
> >>>because there is no bounds attribute pointing to
han
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:48:21AM -0800, Karl Taylor wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:48:21 -0800
From: Karl Taylor
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
To: Kyle Olivo
CC: aparna Radhakrishnan,
"cf-metadata@c
aylor
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
To: Kyle Olivo
CC: aparna Radhakrishnan,
"cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu", "Doutriaux,
Charles"
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CF Standards
Hi all,
If a,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:48:21AM -0800, Karl Taylor wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:48:21 -0800
From: Karl Taylor
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
To: Kyle Olivo
CC: aparna Radhakrishnan,
"cf-metadata@cgd.
ike the checker couldn't tell that they were bounds
> >>variables,
> >>because there is no bounds attribute pointing to them. They look like data
> >>variables.
> >>
> >>Best wishes
> >>
> >>Jonathan
> >>
> >>
:48:21 -0800
From: Karl Taylor
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
To: Kyle Olivo
CC: aparna Radhakrishnan,
"cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu", "Doutriaux,
Charles"
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CF Standards
acintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
To: Kyle Olivo
CC: aparna Radhakrishnan,
"cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu", "Doutriaux,
Charles"
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CF Standards
Hi all,
If a, b, a_bnds, and b_bnds are dimensionless (
:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
> > To: Kyle Olivo
> > CC: aparna Radhakrishnan ,
> > "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" , "Doutriaux,
> > Charles"
> > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] CF Standards
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
11 09:48:21 -0800
> From: Karl Taylor
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
> rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
> To: Kyle Olivo
> CC: aparna Radhakrishnan ,
> "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" , "Doutriaux,
> Charles
Hi all,
If a, b, a_bnds, and b_bnds are dimensionless (and I think they are),
then CF should not raise an error that "no units attribute set". Does
anyone disagree?
thanks,
Karl
On 2/23/11 6:55 AM, Kyle Olivo wrote:
Hi Charles,
We recently CMORized the Amon variable clw and noticed that t
21 matches
Mail list logo
