cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size
> distributionexpressedin numbers ?
>
> Dear Bruno, Jonathan and Roy,
>
> Thanks all for your comments. As far as the standard name is
> concerned,
> I think we are agreed on aerosol_pa
ar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-
> boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 27 November 2010 14:21
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size
> distributionexpressedin numbers ?
>
> Dear Bruno
>
> Either the geophysical q
Dear Bruno
Either the geophysical quantity or the bin index could be the coordinate
variable, with the other one being an auxiliary coordinate variable. That
is an arbitrary choice. If you don't need the bin index, you don't have to
have such a variable at all. Both
SPP200_bins = 30 ;
Jonathan,
I tried to re-phrase your proposal, following Alison and others on
diameters, and trying to give meaningful names (at least to me)
I think that coordinate attribute should indicate a geophysical value
rater than and index, so now, the coordinate attribute points to
"SPP200_median_
ucar.edu
[mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of alison.pamm...@stfc.ac.uk
Sent: 24 November 2010 13:47
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size
distributionexpressedin numbers ?
Dear Jonathan and Bruno,
I agree with Jonathan's point th
ta-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-
> boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory
> Sent: 24 November 2010 12:30
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] Correct name for aerosol size
> distributionexpressedin numbers ?
>
> Dear Bruno
>
> >
