Thanks, Jonathan.
On 2/21/2012 11:18 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
Dear John
However, im not sure what this sentence in 7.4 means: "When
considering intervals within days, if the earlier time of day is
equal to the later time of day, then the method is applied to a full
24 hour day."
It doesn't
On 2/21/2012 7:48 AM, Jim Biard wrote:
John,
Is this actually climatology data? If it were climatology data, it
would usually be the average for a given hour, day, or whatever, where
the average is taken over a decade or so. I think you may just need
to apply regular bounds.
You might be
Dear John
> However, im not sure what this sentence in 7.4 means: "When
> considering intervals within days, if the earlier time of day is
> equal to the later time of day, then the method is applied to a full
> 24 hour day."
It doesn't matter in the instantaneous case, but it does matter for sta
John,
Is this actually climatology data? If it were climatology data, it
would usually be the average for a given hour, day, or whatever, where
the average is taken over a decade or so. I think you may just need to
apply regular bounds.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 2/20/2012 12:27 PM, John C
Im working with NOAA's CFSR dataset, reading it into the CDM, which
essentially means converting GRIB into CF/netCDF.
ref:
http://nomads.ncdc.noaa.gov/data.php#cfs-reanal-data
http://dss.ucar.edu/datasets/ds093.2/
from NCAR's DSS page:
"CFSR monthly atmospheric, oceanic and land surface outpu
