Hi all,
As some of you have heard, we are holding a meeting to discuss current and
future netCDF-CF efforts and directions. The meeting will be held on 24-26
May 2016 in Boulder, CO, USA at the UCAR Center Green facility.
This meeting is organized by the “Advancing netCDF-CF for Geoscience”
proje
ke them look the same,
but we should be able to define a mapping for all those concepts which are in
both.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from Ethan Davis -
> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:24:56 -0600
> From: Ethan Davis
> To: CF metadata , netCDF SWG
>
> Subjec
Ethan,
Two more topics to consider as additions to your list:
1. "UGRID" -- Of interest to the coastal ocean modeling community, and
stuck in a holding pattern for quite a long time, is the harmonization
of mesh/unstructured grid coordinates into the main body of CF. The
work is mostly compl
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Steve Hankin
wrote:
> Two more topics to consider as additions to your list:
>
> 1. "UGRID" -- Of interest to the coastal ocean modeling community, and
> stuck in a holding pattern for quite a long time, is the harmonization of
> mesh/unstructured grid coordinates
etCDF SWG
mailto:netcdf@lists.opengeospatial.org>>
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016,
Boulder, CO, USA
Ethan,
Two more topics to consider as additions to your list:
1. "UGRID" -- Of interest to the coastal ocean modeling community, and stuc
Hi Randy,
Sorry you won't be able to join us in May.
Thanks for the GOES-R / CF document! I'm sure it will be a good resource in
discussions about CF and satellite data. The project folks focused on
satellite data are planning to use the existing
cf-satell...@unidata.ucar.edu email list [1] to ma
Hi Steve,
Thanks for those introducing those topics. I've added them to our list of
topics and made note of Chris, David, and Roy's comments.
I will get our list of possible agenda topics and a rough schedule up on
the meeting page [1] today or tomorrow that we will update as the agenda
solidifie
Ethan:I would very much appreciate participating remotely when the discussions of space weather products came up.I am already a member of cf_satellite so no issue.The problem with my tech memo is there is SO MUCH THERE. Discussions on the message board usually attack one “construct” at a time. It
the
> same,
> but we should be able to define a mapping for all those concepts which are
> in
> both.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jonathan
>
> - Forwarded message from Ethan Davis -
>
> > Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 22:24:56 -0600
> > From: Ethan Davis
> >
behalf of Steve Hankin
> mailto:steven.c.han...@noaa.gov>>
> Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 9:25 AM
> To: Ethan Davis mailto:eda...@ucar.edu>>, CF metadata
> mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>>, netCDF SWG
> mailto:netcdf@lists.opengeospatial.org>>
>
riginal message from Moroni, David F (398G) (12AM 29 Mar 16)
>
>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:01:00 +
>> From: "Moroni, David F (398G)"
>> To: Steve Hankin , Ethan Davis ,
>> CF metadata , netCDF SWG
>>
>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Meeting invit
Ethan Davis mailto:eda...@ucar.edu>>
Date: Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 9:24 PM
To: CF metadata mailto:cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu>>,
netCDF SWG
mailto:netcdf@lists.opengeospatial.org>>
Subject: [CF-metadata] Meeting invite: Advancing netCDF-CF, 24-26 May 2016,
Boulder, CO, USA
Hi al
Hi Randy,
Great, I'll add you to the list of folks planning to join remotely.
Yes, there is a lot in that tech memo. An overview/introduction sounds very
useful.
Thanks for the information on the ISO work dealing with space weather. I've
had some conversations with others interested in this work
n CF and OGC CRS descriptions.
>> Some
>> extensions to help with this are in
>> http://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/80,
>> which will be in CF 1.7, as will http://cf-trac.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/69,
>> which
>> allows WKT to be stored in a CF attribute. CF an
14 matches
Mail list logo
