Re: [CF-metadata] More background on the burned area (Jonathan Gregory)

2011-07-27 Thread Schultz, Martin
Jonathan, Kevin, I don't think that it is necessary to further qualify burned_area. If you do an internet search for this term you always come up with hits related to wildfire which would suggest that there is little ambiguity in this term. I propose to add the vegetation fire relationship

Re: [CF-metadata] More background on the burned area

2011-07-26 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Kevin burned_area and burned_area_fraction would be OK as standard names, I think, but I would tend to agree with your suggestion that vegetation could also be mentioned somehow, in order to make the standard_name more self-explanatory when in the context of a dataset that might contain many

[CF-metadata] More background on the burned area

2011-07-15 Thread Tansey, Kevin J. (Dr.)
Dear colleagues, I have now joined the list and should start receiving comments. To provide more background, on some of the comments I've been sent. 1. I've based it on the sea ice term, it is similar. 2. We use the term severity to describe the level of burning. However, there is much research