Hi Aleksander,
I'm understanding that your data have a time and spectral frequency
axes. Maybe also lat/lon position of the satellite as a function of
time? (i.e. defining a trajectory)
With only this to go on it sounds like the simple CDL below might be be
a sufficient outline. (You woul
Hi Steven, John:
Thanks for mentioning the CF-satellite list. I was told about it just
two days ago and have already joined.
My data is not of the satellite swath type. It is a time series of
calibration correction coefficients for all channels of a satellite
instrument. One (time, chan) var
i agree that satellite data needs to be a seperate convention.
you can join the conversation by subscribing to cf-satellite at
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/support/help/
On 10/7/2010 3:08 PM, Steve Hankin wrote:
Hi Aleksandar,
Satellite datasets have a range of needs that the
PointObservati
Hi Aleksandar,
Satellite datasets have a range of needs that the
PointObservationConventions (a.k.a. Discrete Sampling Geometries") don't
try to address. It might be worth your while consulting with some of
the individuals who are working on applications of CF to satellite obs.
I've cc'ed
Dear Jonathan,
I am seeking a clarification about the proposed addition to the CF
convention for discrete sampling geometries data:
https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/PointObservationConventions
My data would fit the Single timeSeries type except the variables have
more than one dimension: va
Dear Aleksandar
> I am seeking a clarification about the proposed addition to the CF
> convention for discrete sampling geometries data:
>
> https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/PointObservationConventions
>
> My data would fit the Single timeSeries type except the variables have
> more than on
Hello everyone,
I am seeking a clarification about the proposed addition to the CF
convention for discrete sampling geometries data:
https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/PointObservationConventions
My data would fit the Single timeSeries type except the variables have
more than one dimension:
