flag_masks?
>
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> From: Jim Biard
> Sent: 21 November 2018 20:50
> To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP); cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values allowed?
>
>
> Martin,
>
> The
et of flag_values when used in
conjunction with flag_masks?
regards,
Martin
From: Jim Biard
Sent: 21 November 2018 20:50
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP); cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values allowed?
Martin,
Th
: Jim Biard
Sent: 21 November 2018 20:50
To: Juckes, Martin (STFC,RAL,RALSP); cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values allowed?
Martin,
The two subfields are independent. You can have very bad quality data and very
bad weather at the same time. And that&#
lue would make zero ambiguous, so you need to
start the 2nd sequence at 4.
regards,
Martin
From: CF-metadata on behalf of Jim Biard
Sent: 20 November 2018 16:51:24
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values all
2018 16:51:24
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Multiple zeros in flag_values allowed?
Julien,
That's fine. The conformance document probably needs a better statement of the
requirement when flag masks are used.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 11/20/18 11:40 AM, Julien Demar
Julien,
That's fine. The conformance document probably needs a better statement
of the requirement when flag masks are used.
Grace and peace,
Jim
On 11/20/18 11:40 AM, Julien Demaria wrote:
Hi,
We want to define a flags variable defining like that:
var:flag_masks = 3, 3, 3, 3, 12, 12, 12
Hi,
We want to define a flags variable defining like that:
var:flag_masks = 3, 3, 3, 3, 12, 12, 12, 12 ;
var:flag_values = 0, 1, 2, 3, 0,4, 8, 12 ;
var:flag_meanings = "very_bad_quality bad_qualitygood_quality
very_good_quality
