Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard names: depth/bathy/topo rel to datum

2011-04-14 Thread Lowry, Roy K.
- From: cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory Sent: 14 April 2011 09:33 To: Justin R. Davis Cc: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard names: depth/bathy/topo rel to datum D

Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard names: depth/bathy/topo rel to datum

2011-04-14 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Justin > sea_floor_depth_below_reference_datum (positive down) looks fine to me. Isn't this the same thing: > bathymetry_below_reference_datum (postive down) "bathymetry" means sea-floor depth, doesn't it? For consistency with other stdnames, in particular height_above_reference_ellip

[CF-metadata] Proposal for new standard names: depth/bathy/topo rel to datum

2011-04-13 Thread Justin R. Davis
Recently, there was added a standard name to define water level referenced to an atrbitrary vertical datum: water_surface_height_above_reference_datum I'd like to propose that a new standard name be created to indicate the sea floor depth to an arbitrary datum. Something along the lines of