[CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "surface_snow_cover_binary_mask"

2012-09-06 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear Jim and Roy > So, to sum up, the standard name and definition would be: > surface_snow_cover_binary_mask: The value is 1 where the snow cover area > fraction is greater than a threshold, and 0 elsewhere. The threshold must be > specified by associating a scalar coordinate variable with the

Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "surface_snow_cover_binary_mask"

2012-09-05 Thread Jim Biard
Jonathan, That sounds great! I was thinking there needed to be some way to capture the 42% figure. So, to sum up, the standard name and definition would be: surface_snow_cover_binary_mask: The value is 1 where the snow cover area fraction is greater than a threshold, and 0 elsewhere. The thre