Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-09 Thread Jonathan Gregory
n I shall drop my objections. I just note that > >the proposal description for land_surface_skin_temperature states that the > >distinction is not very important. > > > >Best wishes :-), > > > > Philip > > > >-

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-09 Thread Jonathan Wrotny
age- From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of John Graybeal Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 6:04 PM To: CF Metadata List Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures Philip, to be clear, are you saying one should, or should not, compare values from a model to obse

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-04 Thread Cameron-smith, Philip
r Philip Cameron-Smith, p...@llnl.gov, Lawrence Livermore National Lab. --- > -Original Message- > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf > Of John Graybeal > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 6:04 PM > To:

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-04 Thread John Graybeal
------------- > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jonathan Wrotny [mailto:jwro...@aer.com] >> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:40 PM >> To: Cameron-smith, Philip >> Cc: Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu >> Subject: Re

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-04 Thread Cameron-smith, Philip
2013 12:40 PM > To: Cameron-smith, Philip > Cc: Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures > > Dear Philip, > > My take is that the land_surface_skin_temperature and the > surface_temperature are likely very close in value, si

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wrotny
-Original Message- From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:35 AM To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures Dear Jonathan The new proposal looks fine to me. Thanks. I see that you d

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-03 Thread Cameron-smith, Philip
awrence Livermore National Lab. --- > -Original Message- > From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf > Of Jonathan Gregory > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 9:35 AM > To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures >

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-03 Thread Karl Taylor
7.0.8 To: Jonathan Gregory , "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures Dear Jonathan Gregory, I am getting back to this reply after a long time - sorry, I was pulled in a few different directions lately. Hopefully, it is possible to bring

Re: [CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-10-03 Thread Jonathan Gregory
rotny - > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 11:26:27 -0400 > From: Jonathan Wrotny > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 > Thunderbird/17.0.8 > To: Jonathan Gregory , "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu" > > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Surface tem

[CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-08-01 Thread Jonathan Gregory
Dear all I agree with Karl than in CF standard names "land" means "non-sea", whereas sea-ice is part of sea. Hence I would support adding land_surface_skin_ temperature, for use by applications which classify locations as land or sea. However I also agree with Evan that one can approach this more

[CF-metadata] Surface temperatures

2013-07-18 Thread Evan Manning
Let's pull in some existing surface temperature fields from the standard name table. surface_temperature alias: surface_temperature_where_land alias: surface_temperature_where_open_sea alias: surface_temperature_where_snow The surface called "surface" means the lower boundary of the atmosphere. Th