r.edu] on behalf of Jonathan
>> Gregory [j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk]
>> Sent: 31 October 2014 15:25
>> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
>> Subject: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
>>
>> Dear Mark
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying the use-case. I agree that we don
nk?
yes, that seems suitable to me
mark
From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] on behalf of Jonathan
Gregory [j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk]
Sent: 31 October 2014 15:25
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
D
regory [j.m.greg...@reading.ac.uk]
Sent: 31 October 2014 15:25
To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
Dear Mark
Thanks for clarifying the use-case. I agree that we don't have an existing way
to provide this information, and it would be fine to give it a new stand
me would be
needed.
Best wishes
Jonathan
> - Forwarded message from "Hedley, Mark"
> -
>
> > Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:50:53 +
> > From: "Hedley, Mark"
> > To: John Graybeal
> > CC: CF Metadata List
> > Subject: R
elative to its original group
(even if the group is no longer intact).
mark
From: John Graybeal [jbgrayb...@mindspring.com]
Sent: 31 October 2014 17:27
To: Hedley, Mark
Cc: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
As I indicated, I think i
ark
>
> From: John Graybeal [jbgrayb...@mindspring.com]
> Sent: 30 October 2014 23:14
> To: Hedley, Mark
> Cc: CF Metadata List
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
>
> Glad you liked the text!
>
> Regarding 'given ensemble' vs 'original e
think?
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Hedley, Mark" -
> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 14:50:53 +
> From: "Hedley, Mark"
> To: John Graybeal
> CC: CF Metadata List
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
>
> I'm h
ber 2014 23:14
To: Hedley, Mark
Cc: CF Metadata List
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] realization | x of n
Glad you liked the text!
Regarding 'given ensemble' vs 'original ensemble', how can we resolve the
ambiguity? That is, if you use this attribute, how will the user know what
e
Glad you liked the text!
Regarding 'given ensemble' vs 'original ensemble', how can we resolve the
ambiguity? That is, if you use this attribute, how will the user know what
ensemble the attribute is in reference to?
If the 'common practice among forecasters' (and required capability) is
excl
e it
does not require any coordinate vars to exist with this dimension (though they
could if you want to supply them too).
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Hedley, Mark" -
> From: "Hedley, Mark"
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Date: Fri
Mark,
I don't think there is any real need for a number_of_realizations
attribute or standard name. The size of the dimension associated with
the coordinate variable associated with the 'realization' standard name
provides the number of realizations. If the coordinate variable with
this stand
Hello CF
The standard name
realization
is available for use:
Realization is used to label a dimension that can be thought of asa
statistical sample, e.g., labelling members of a model ensemble.
It is common practice in forecasting and some forecasting formats to explicitly
state the number
12 matches
Mail list logo