ution which avoids having
a number in the standard_name.
Best wishes
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from "Schultz, Martin" -
> From: "Schultz, Martin"
> To: "cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu"
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:55:00 +
> Subject: Re:
Hi Andreas,
> -Original Message-
> From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-boun...@cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf
> Of Andreas Hilboll
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 2:53 AM
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for column amou
dnesday, December 19, 2012 2:53 AM
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] standard names for column amounts (atmospheric
> chemistry)
>
> Hi Philip,
>
> > Good news: we have recently been discussing just such a quantity on this
> > emai
Hi Philip,
> Good news: we have recently been discussing just such a quantity on this
> email list.
Yeay :)
> The quantity was specifically for ozone, but can easily be proposed for
> other species.
I guess I'll need some help with that.
> The title of the email discussion was: "new standar
car.edu] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Hilboll
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:05 AM
> To: cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu
> Subject: [CF-metadata] standard names for column amounts (atmospheric
> chemistry)
>
> Hi all,
>
> in atmospheric remote sensing, one often works with the
Hi all,
in atmospheric remote sensing, one often works with the quantity
"vertical {atmos/tropos/stratos}pheric column
{place_any_trace_gas_here}, the quantity of which is "molecules per
squared centimeter".
So I'm wondering
a) if such names might be added to the CF standard names
b) which way I