Ute,
It is a good concept. As best as I understand it (I'm still learning), the
existing grammar for standard names doesn't allow a qualifier of this sort.
Qualifiers are not allowed to change the units of a quantity, for one thing,
and a binary mask qualifier doesn't fit into any of the exis
r 2012 19:49
To: Ute Brönner; Jim Biard
Cc: Heather Brown; Raymond Nepstad; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Alisa Young
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"
Dear All,
It's becoming clear that we need a Standard Name component to cover boolean
val
e.broen...@sintef.no]
Sent: 05 September 2012 18:40
To: Jim Biard
Cc: Heather Brown; Raymond Nepstad; cf-metadata@cgd.ucar.edu; Alisa Young
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"
Hei,
Wouldn't that feature come in handy for other grids as well where
Hei,
Wouldn't that feature come in handy for other grids as well where we would like
to mark sth. like "exposed" or "not exposed"? So I would suggest to make it
snow independent.
Regards,
Ute
Am 05.09.2012 um 18:31 schrieb "Jim Biard"
mailto:jim.bi...@noaa.gov>>:
Hi.
I'd like to propose the
