Re: MXDU (was: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Sunday, Mar 2, 2003, at 19:55 US/Pacific, Tilbrook, Peter wrote: > Oh! And Ben Forta CAN give keynote speeches! He's quite funny actually! I'm not sure why this is a surprise to anyone... :) Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really a

Re: OnLoad for ?

2003-03-02 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Did you specify name="LoginForm" in your cfform tag? And are you sure the capitalization is all correct in the source output? > Is there an alternative to the > > For use with the tag? The above only works on > standard FORM input > tags - not CFFORM. > == > Peter Tilbrook > Internet Applicat

RE: OnLoad for ?

2003-03-02 Thread Joe Eugene
> Is there an alternative to the > > You can try.. an inline script at the end of your page like.. document.forms[0].elements['UserEmailAddress'].focus(); Joe Eugene > -Original Message- > From: Tilbrook, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 11:28 PM >

Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-02 Thread Kay Smoljak
samcfug wrote: > Yes we did demo the application - in fact this was done via our pioneering use > of Flashcom server. Contribute was our topic that day. > But like you said, Contribute is not targeted at Developer types, and this is > who we have in attendance. Obviously developers aren't going

OnLoad for ?

2003-03-02 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
Is there an alternative to the For use with the tag? The above only works on standard FORM input tags - not CFFORM. == Peter Tilbrook Internet Applications Developer Australian Building Codes Board GPO Box 9839 CANBERRA ACT 2601 AUSTRALIA WWW: http://www.abcb.gov.au/ E-Mail: [EMAIL P

RE: MXDU (was: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
Daemon did a great job! The are currently beavering away making changes to the website to feature content from the conference (photos/keynotes, etc) at www.mxdu.com - should go online this week. Oh! And Ben Forta CAN give keynote speeches! He's quite funny actually! == Peter Tilbrook Internet App

MXDU (was: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Sunday, Mar 2, 2003, at 19:31 US/Pacific, Tilbrook, Peter wrote: > Exchange is about as good as they come. They use it here. > Unfortunately, > from a developer's point of view, it can be frustrating when writing > applications that send/receive email. Or trying to integrate with it from anyth

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
Exchange is about as good as they come. They use it here. Unfortunately, from a developer's point of view, it can be frustrating when writing applications that send/receive email. Our ColdFusion server is hosted remotely and is proving to be very good at expediently sending out application generate

Re: CF wish list (was: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-02 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Sunday, Mar 2, 2003, at 17:07 US/Pacific, samcfug wrote: > Does this mean that we need a Jrun Admin GUI? You mean the JRun Management Console? It already exists and it's probably the most user-friendly J2EE server admin UI on the market! There cannot reasonably be a link between the two Admin

Re: iis authentication problem

2003-03-02 Thread Mahmut Basaran
ok, problem is resolved. Damn "everyone" user had a DENY for write in deny list. So, for people having the same problem: 1) make sure your c:\inetpub\wwwroot is configured properly. 2) make really sure you also check C:\CFUSIONMX\WWWROOT as coldfusion compiles the files in this directory. As far a

iis authentication problem

2003-03-02 Thread Mahmut Basaran
I'm having some problems with cf mx and iis 5.0. For every cfmx request iis is responding with a login pop up. If you enter administrator / password, template continues to execute. I checked the folder permissions for c:\inetpub and c:\cfusionmx\inetpub and gave full access to everyone group an

Re: CF wish list (was: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-02 Thread samcfug
| you'll see that most of the configuration that I needed to do with CFMX | for J2EE was actually in the J2EE server, not CFMX, and so I was | dealing with specifics of JRun - you can't expect that sort of | functionality to be exposed via CF Admin when it is so app-server | dependent. | Does this

CF wish list (was: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-02 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Saturday, Mar 1, 2003, at 22:38 US/Pacific, samcfug wrote: > But I certainly have a wish list for the server products, So do we :) http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/ > and that would be to > incorporate into CF Administrator, provisions for making all the > tweaks and > settin

OT sort of but web based .pdf's really stink and..

2003-03-02 Thread Mike Brunt
I have been surfing around today (good heavens how dated!) looking for a 19” rack frame to test out some new servers in my home lab before we deploy em. I have hit at least 3 sites who pump me directly into a .pdf and it is agonizingly slow even though I have a 768kbps connection (ok I can’t afford

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Sean A Corfield wrote: > On Sunday, Mar 2, 2003, at 12:41 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > >>http://www.enom.com/domains/WhoIs.asp?DomainName=mscromedia.com > > > Which redirects to addressmuncher which is obviously intended to route > typo URLs and, guess what? > > http://www.enom.com/d

OT: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Sunday, Mar 2, 2003, at 12:50 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > MM running exchange for email? thought it was interesting. > > https://webmail.macromedia.com/exchange/logon.asp It's a reasonable (and obvious) solution for a worldwide company with over 1,000 staff who need to coordinate email, ca

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Sunday, Mar 2, 2003, at 12:41 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote: > http://www.enom.com/domains/WhoIs.asp?DomainName=mscromedia.com Which redirects to addressmuncher which is obviously intended to route typo URLs and, guess what? http://www.enom.com/domains/WhoIs.asp?DomainName=addressmunche

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: samcfug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 5:10 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: msft taking over macromedia > > > I use Postfix on Linux for my incoming, which forwards to > whatever after anti-spam filtering and anti-virus filtering.

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jillian Carroll
I know I'm just contributing to a way-off-topic conversation... I think that for the purposes of sending/receiving e-mail, there are far less bloated solutions that prove themselves to be more stable than Exchange. However, I've yet to see a product on the market (Notes comes closest) that offe

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread samcfug
I use Postfix on Linux for my incoming, which forwards to whatever after anti-spam filtering and anti-virus filtering. My main mail server is Sendmail on Linux, although I do own Exchange, it is much more time consuming to administer. = Douglas White group Mana

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> MM running exchange for email? thought it was interesting. > > https://webmail.macromedia.com/exchange/logon.asp > How so? Best tool for the job in my opinion... What else would they run, Lotus Notes? Why anybody would want to inflict Notes upon an unsuspecting and innocent populace is beyon

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: samcfug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:36 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: msft taking over macromedia > > > First, I took it as a tongue-in-cheek comment telling us of > the added support in DreamweaverMX. Only he can conform/den

RE: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 6:22 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ... > > > Just to save me spending too much time trying to figure this out ... > > Anybody alre

RE: PHP versus CF Development Speed?

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> >> elaborate haiku? Depends on your definition of elaborate. > >> > >> for item in struct > >> struct[item] equals nothing > >> return structclear(struct) > >> > >> okay ... so it's redundant and it sucks > >> -- the best I could do on short notice. :) > >> > >> >>s. isaac dealey > > > Oh come o

RE: PHP versus CF Development Speed?

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> On Friday, Feb 28, 2003, at 14:12 US/Pacific, Michael Dinowitz wrote: > >> Actually let's reverse that... The livedocs system in use at > >> Macromedia > >> was in use at Allaire in, I think 1998 (around when CF 3 > had come out > >> I > >> think, but perhaps CF 4). > > Actually, I had a 'lived

RE: PHP versus CF Development Speed?

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> I think you're all missing the point if you think that more > code = longer development time. > > Remember, for PHP, there are massive script archives out > there with example code you can just grab and use. Even the > function docs at php.net are collaborative... a technique > Macromedia has

RE: PHP versus CF Development Speed?

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> I think you're all missing the point if you think that more > code = longer development time. > > Remember, for PHP, there are massive script archives out > there with example code you can just grab and use. Even the > function docs at php.net are collaborative... a technique > Macromedia ha

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
why? its one of the most popular. - Original Message - From: "Joe Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 3:50 PM Subject: RE: msft taking over macromedia > MM running exchange for email? thought it was interesting. > > https://webmail

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Joe Eugene
MM running exchange for email? thought it was interesting. https://webmail.macromedia.com/exchange/logon.asp Joe Eugene > -Original Message- > From: Gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 11:22 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: msft taking over macromedia > > > > an

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Gyrus wrote: >>anyone tried the url mscromedia.com lately? > > I imagine Macromedia quite intelligently bought that as S is next to A on > the keyboard, so they're directing typos their way. http://www.enom.com/domains/WhoIs.asp?DomainName=mscromedia.com Jochem ~

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread samcfug
First, I took it as a tongue-in-cheek comment telling us of the added support in DreamweaverMX. Only he can conform/deny this. Second, the word "merger" did not appear in his post, only in the replies. Third. CFML as a language is open-source, so how could MM become litigious over others use or

Re: Writing CF to a string

2003-03-02 Thread Dina Hess
Use the HTMLEditFormat() function, like this: ')#This is a test." ~Dina - Original Message - From: "Andy Ewings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:50 AM Subject: RE: Writing CF to a string > thanks Rich > > -Original Message

RE: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: samcfug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:48 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: msft taking over macromedia > > > He wasn't opening that old debate, he was commenting on the > MM site demonstrating support for ASP.NET and PHP on their

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread samcfug
He wasn't opening that old debate, he was commenting on the MM site demonstrating support for ASP.NET and PHP on their web site. = Douglas White group Manager mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.samcfug.org = - Original

Re: Macromedia at Risk (Was OT - Fusebox for Flash?)

2003-03-02 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> - Original Message - > From: "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> make flash dev. much easier for me. For instance, if I >> had an AS statement >> that would import a vector graphic > myClip.loadMovie("myvectorgraphic.swf"); Ahhh awesome... Then my only real barrier is the document

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Gyrus
> anyone tried the url mscromedia.com lately? I imagine Macromedia quite intelligently bought that as S is next to A on the keyboard, so they're directing typos their way. No reason to start the "MS taking over" non-debate again... Gyrus [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: http://www.tengai.co.uk play: http

Re: msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread Michael T. Tangorre
don't start this crap again... this pops up at least once a month. - Original Message - From: "DDB Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 6:14 AM Subject: msft taking over macromedia > It would seem the borg have already started with the

Re: anybody ever done: every n day of the month for a year ...

2003-03-02 Thread Jesse Houwing
Owens, Howard wrote: >Oops, found a problem with this UDF ... > >It give you the option of feeding in a 5 for the Nth recurrence, which 5, as >I take it, should equal 'last' ... meaning, say, the Last Friday of the >month. Some months that will be the 5th Friday, some months the 4th. > >So for No

msft taking over macromedia

2003-03-02 Thread DDB Lists
It would seem the borg have already started with the assimilation: anyone tried the url mscromedia.com lately? ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_