Yep, strangest thing, it puts in that "-server" option, both on windows and
linux installs. You have to go track down that config file, probably
jvm.config in your %installdir%\runtime\bin folder, or for J2EE it could be
just in the \bin folder... well track it down, take out the -server
argument,
thanks Dave! Thats a good thing too know!
what would the proper cfm code be?
or
would that be ok?
thanks!
>> im trying to convert an asp site to cfm and im going through
>> an xml output and i come across this code
>>
>> Response.Write ""
>>
>> not sure what the CDATA is??
>>
>> what
I am having problems starting "cfusion" on Win2k J2EE Configuration.
This happened after i changed the classPath Setting for "cfusion" server.
Here is the error.
E:\JRun4\bin>JRun -start cfusion
Unrecognized option: -server
Could not create the Java virtual machine.
Anyone know how i can resol
oops, cut all my message out, grrr
i think this is the problem
MsgList.load (_root.URLpreFix+"message.asp?page="+_root.curPage);
of course its asp, so we change it to cfm but its the =page, deal i think
thats messed up
so i output my cfm on the message.cfm page in xml which works fine
but it
LOL, right on!
i think i have it all but this on page that loads the xml
here is original code
___
var sstr="..";
var MsgList = new XML();
MsgList.ignoreWhite=true;
MsgList.>
MsgList.load (_root.URLpreFix+"message.asp?page="+_root.cur
Stacy Young wrote:
"Honestly, you'd be crazy not to use 6.1...the speed and scalability
factors alone justify the upgrade! There are some minor idiosyncrasies,
as with any software...but overall I'm very happy with 6.1"
I second that. I was not at all happy with 6.0 and held off the upgrade
until
What code, specifically, is tripping you up? Post it on up! We'll slap
its ass and call it Charlie.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: sweet guestbook!! but..
I have this
The CF market definitely is split at least as far as versions are
concerned. Many larger clients (my company included) seem to be in
holding pattern with CF 4.5 while most smaller shops seem to be
upgrading at least to 5 if not MX.
Some comments:
1) Most hosts that actually care about CF hav
Honestly, you'd be crazy not to use 6.1...the speed and scalability
factors alone justify the upgrade! There are some minor idiosyncrasies,
as with any software...but overall I'm very happy with 6.1
Stace
_
From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 19, 2003 10:46 PM
To:
I think the difference between 4.5.1 is HUGE, the advantages are HUGE:
1. Speed and Stability of the Server (although early versions of MX were not!)
2. Compiled vs Interpreted pages
3. XML integration
4. Web Service Integration
5. Flash Remoting
6. CFC's are awesome
7. UDF's are a huge advantage
I have a COM object that is called often. Would I run into problems if I
stored it in the application scope? Would I need to lock calls to it?
Brook
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I have been distracted from spending much time keeping up with CF within
the last couple of years. We upgraded to 5.0 and then I disappeared. I now
find myself with a huge void in knowledge of releases beyond 5.0. (Actually
a void of just how productive, i.e., functionality versus problems, 5.0
> im trying to convert an asp site to cfm and im going through
> an xml output and i come across this code
>
> Response.Write ""
>
> not sure what the CDATA is??
>
> what do i do with it?
>
> is it ok to just do this?
>
>
>
>
>
> or can i take it out?
The CDATA is an XML type that
13 matches
Mail list logo
