Re: Forums onTap - check 'em out! :)

2004-07-24 Thread Aaron DC
The page you have requested has generated an error. The system administrator has been notified via email of the problem and will attempt to resolve the issue as quickly as possible Aaron - Original Message - From: S. Isaac Dealey To: CF-Talk Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 3:06 PM Subject:

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread dave
im not sure dick, look at this http://www.yockeys.com/529/ky.html took about 20 minutes, i made it to send to my grandparents and even on dial up it runs pretty fast and running a jukebox should be less of course u could use flash comm u could even speed that up using remoting -- Original

Forums onTap - check 'em out! :)

2004-07-24 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Hi All, I just wanted to announce to the list that I've recently launched some new forums for the onTap framework. You can all check them out at: http://www.turnkey.to/ontap/forum They'll be available soon for a nominal fee of $20-25 just to help cover the cost of hosting for the framework. For

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread Dick Applebaum
The main reason is the Flash overhead. I have played around quite a bit with Flash in general, and a mp3 player in particular. Flash is just too CPU intensive -- open 2 or 3 browser windows the the Macromedia site & it will affect the performance of other apps on your desktop.  I am not saying

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread Dick Applebaum
The main reason is the Flash overhead. I have played around quite a bit with Flash in general, and a mp3 player in particular. Flash is just too CPU intensive -- open 2 or 3 browser windows the the Macromedia site & it will affect the performance of other apps on your desktop.  I am not saying

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread dave
somewhere i have some code for a pretty good cf jukebox thingy but why do that when u can easily make a kick ass one in flash? -- Original Message -- From: Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:  Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:06:57 -0700

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread Dick Applebaum
Is it worth joining to see the page? What's it about? TIA Dick "The important thing is not to stop questioning." - Albert Einstein - On Jul 24, 2004, at 6:27 PM, Nando wrote: > Reading along, i just found this > >  http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/6561.htm > >  seems to be the / a way to

RE: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread Nando
Reading along, i just found this http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/6561.htm seems to be the / a way to go for this. Anyone else have anything better? -Original Message- From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 1:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF Juke

Re: Clear client variables for a single client

2004-07-24 Thread Matt Robertson
Not sure which CF version you are running, but this should do it on any of them:  Pulled this out of some working code: index="ListElement" list="#GetClientVariablesList()#"> On CF6+ you can probably use a structdelete of some sort, I would think.  Also you can probably change the cfset to

Re: A script to Prevent SQL Injection: feedback/suggestions?

2004-07-24 Thread Matt Robertson
> I think it might have been me! Hi Andrew, Thats what I remembered but wasn't 100% :-) Interesting thread indeed. Can htmleditformat be relied upon as a replacement for the url check?  I use all this security stuff pretty religiously but insofar as being able to account for as much as possible.

Re: SOT: Interesting SPAM

2004-07-24 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
I was confused by that one when I first saw it also... though I've seen so many of them since then that they've just become more FUCKING NIGERIANS to me. > I received the SPAM below.  It purports to provide a > clearing service > to request info about somebody and gather feedback. > In this case,

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread Dick Applebaum
Mike Thanks for the chide & the advice -- I will see if I can find standalone downloads for IE 5 & IE 5.5. Dick "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." - Andrew S. Tanenbaum - On Jul 24, 2004, at 2:49 PM, Mike Alberts wrote: > >I didn't test on IE 5

SOT: Interesting SPAM

2004-07-24 Thread Dick Applebaum
I received the SPAM below.  It purports to provide a clearing service to request info about somebody and gather feedback. In this case, the somebody is me! Even though it is tantalizing to know what others are asking/saying about you, I realized that I don't really care & declined to play their

Re: CF Jukebox redux - what browsers to support.

2004-07-24 Thread Mike Alberts
>I didn't test on IE 5.5 shame on you ;-) >Brings up a good question -- What browsers should I support especially >on win? There are still millions of users on IE 5 and 5.5 on Windows. I'm not happy about having to support them either, but how can you just ignore that many users? That's why we

Clear client variables for a single client

2004-07-24 Thread James Edmunds
Dear all, Is there a script I can run that will clear client variables for a single client, i.e., the client that is running the script? Thanks in advance, James [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]