If you don't want to do cfqueryparam, use the SQL version. The SQL version
works well if you want to put the query in a folded string that can be
passed to a function that does the cfquery. Data binding is done either
way. In all cases, I think doing the data binding declaration is a best
pra
I would have to chime in here and state that Verity is broken in V7.
Here's why:
I upgraded from v6.1 Std to v7 Std this past weekend. In v6.1 all searching
worked perfectly for 2+ years. I use collections built from SQL queries
obtained from MS-Access (I know, I know - don't bash me for using Ac
I was wondering if itâs possible to bind hidden field data in Flash Forms.
I have tried both {myfield.text} and {myfield.label} without any positive
results.
Here is a short example of what i'm trying to do. This binding will be used
for a confirmation page.
Any suggest
Well, true, but you have to assume that people are capable of typing
dates in any "normal" date format. If they type "403" for a date, they
should be slapped silly, the shown an error message.
I assumed "any number of formats" meant reasonable dates syntaxes.
If it were me, I would use qForms AP
Theres one due out right away.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:26 PM
Subject: Future DRK?
> Anyone know if there is going to be a DRK 11?
>
>
~|
Fi
11 has been out awhile
DRK Vol. 11
Dreamweaver Extensions: Accordion List, Image Preview, PHP5 Code Hints, WA
Site Import
Flash Accordion Tab Component
Flash Sample Apps -- Ebay with Flash Lite, Multi-Choice Sample App
Coldfusion Component: Captcha
Coldfusion Sample Apps -- Light
depending on how you're handling the data, isDate can give you some
funkiness. There are a lot of values which are considered "valid date
objects" which don't fit your actual needs for a date. I'd go with Bob's
suggestion of a regex.
eg.
#isdate("403")# -- NO
#isdate("4/03")# -- YES
#isdate("4-0
I don't know the numbering, but the last DRK will be Q4 2005.
-Adam
On 7/6/05, Christopher. Lomvardias @ csirc. irs. gov Christopher.
Lomvardias @ csirc. irs. gov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Anyone know if there is going to be a DRK 11?
>
>
On 7/6/05, Anthony Prato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now I'm wondering how to use coldfusion to post xml
--
Eddie Awad.
http://awads.net/
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket applic
Anthony
>From Edie's post a couple of days ago.
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:211166
To post XML over http you can use something like this.:
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
"C code. C code run. Run code
In answer to your first question:
... Put stuff here to deal with invalid requests ...
I just asked the same question a few days ago an that was a reply I
got. Now I'm wondering how to use coldfusion to post xml. The only i
have heard of is the cfx_socket tag th
On 7/6/05, Rebecca Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, how do I access the XML document that will be posted to my web
> app (via HTTPS POST)?
http://awads.net/wp/2005/07/06/read-xml-from-an-http-post/
> Second, is there any easier way to refer to an particular XML element
> as a simple valu
In answer to your second question. Parse you xml into a CF XML object.
Then you can do things like this.
#variables.myXMLobj.Name.First.xmlText#
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
"C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!"
- Cynthia Du
I'm trying to figure out how to handle an XML file that will be
transmitted to my web app. Since I don't have an example of the actual
XML file, I created a test XML document stored in the variable named
"myXML".
First, how do I access the XML document that will be posted to my web
app (via HTTPS
Anyone know if there is going to be a DRK 11?
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.c
On 7/6/05, Connie DeCinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh lighten up!
After all of the pain and suffering from the last 'banner' thread, we
deserve our cupcakes (plural). Who eats just one of those? I wanna
picnic with Jim!
~|
We ran in this: MM has changed the way cfform/cfinput validations are done.
In CF7 the validation method can be specified at the field level; the
possible values are:
- onsubmit - field validation runs when form is submitted (this is the
default, as in previous versions)
- onblur - field va
On 7/6/05, Claremont, Timothy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am going to install CF7 standard on my 6.1 test server today. I will
> then be going over the site to see that everything is working as it
> should. If all goes well I will repeat the process on my production
> server.
> For due dilligenc
Found it thanks.
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day t
Look in BOL for CAST and CONVERT. That should give you the format you
need.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 3:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL Date Format
I there a function available for an SQL stored procedure that would
f
> I there a function available for an SQL stored procedure
> that would format getdate() as MM/DD/YY ?
look in SQL Server books online for convert()
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://w
I there a function available for an SQL stored procedure
that would format getdate() as MM/DD/YY ?
Lee Surma
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting
I am attempting to connect to an Advantage database.
I have been to the Advantage website and downloaded the ODBC driver, and
installed it. I used the ODBC manager on the server machine to set up a
connection (HHMeds). I then added the new data source in CF
Administrator (HHMeds). When I attempt t
>>Is it really a problem?
Not really, just something that would be nice in the HTML standard, like
some others.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PRO
Oh lighten up!
-Original Message-
From: dmanriquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 9:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Oh..my...god!
Hey hey !!!
Please stop to post crap!!..
Give the right usage of this list... I don't see any "CF" issue in all this
conversatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Claude Schneegans wrote:
>>> So it's a problem with CF or with both browsers.
>
> It's a problem with the HTML standard. There should exist some DEFAULT
> attribute for controls.
> ie:
>
> Fortunately, there is a DEFAULT option in
Is it really a
I am going to install CF7 standard on my 6.1 test server today. I will
then be going over the site to see that everything is working as it
should. If all goes well I will repeat the process on my production
server.
For due dilligence I need to visit virtually every part of the site to
confirm fun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
S.Isaac Dealey wrote:
> The combination of ColdFusion and the placement of the MM home page
> banner ad... There have been continual occasional complaints from
> people on the mailing lists that these two things never coincide, even
> when the "best"
How about isDate()?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Clingan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Validation of Date on Form
You will to write regular expressions to check for those types of dates
you want to allow. Don't forget about sanity
You will to write regular expressions to check for those types of dates you
want to allow. Don't forget about sanity checks like 31st in a month with 30
days and leap year.
>I've got a number of forms in an administration area that will accept a
>date in any number of formats
>
>mm/dd/
>mm/
Move thread to cfcommunity (please;)
Damien McKenna wrote:
>>>Christmas fruit cake is a bit bloating, alright.
>>
>>But remember - there's only ONE fruitcake, it just keeps getting
>>"re-gifted".
>
>
> Relatives of mine used to own a bakery and I can categorically state, on
> the reco
Hey hey !!!
Please stop to post crap!!..
Give the right usage of this list... I don't see any "CF" issue in all this
conversation!...
Please guys. Its enough
-Mensaje original-
De: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:04 PM
Para: CF-Talk
Asu
> > Christmas fruit cake is a bit bloating, alright.
>
> But remember - there's only ONE fruitcake, it just keeps getting
> "re-gifted".
Relatives of mine used to own a bakery and I can categorically state, on
the record, that there were *definitely*... two... maybe even three
fruitcakes made.
> Christmas fruit cake is a bit bloating, alright.
But remember - there's only ONE fruitcake, it just keeps getting
"re-gifted".
--
---
Les Mizzell
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tra
Thanks John (and Dave),
John nailed it for meI had thought there'd be a way of grabbing the
HTML.but CFHTTP just didn't come to me at the time ;-)
That should do the trickalways up to date and we can have our own
security so we're not giving up the good old admin password to folks t
> (It's also annoying that cupcakes get such a bad rap for the
> same reasons - they really are the perfect form of cake. Not
> big enough to make you sick or tempt you unduly like a "real"
> cake but the same taste and enough substance to savor.
You really should try making a cake yourself usin
> Having been subjected to the darkside of the .NET lately I can
> honestly say I feel bloated and somewhat icky and violated (OK I'm
> taking this too far) ... just like I would be if I ate some huge
> monsterous thing topped off with marzepan.
Christmas fruit cake is a bit bloating, alright. Ju
I've got a number of forms in an administration area that will accept a
date in any number of formats
mm/dd/
mm/dd/yy
July 4, 2005
and so on...
I need a way to validate this field so if somebody types something other
than an accepted date (like "Bob") they get an alert saying "Please
On 7/6/05, Parker, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone advise me when the replyto attribute was introduced into
> CFMAIL, Ver 5, 6 or 7.
http://www.cielen.com/cfmlhistory/tags/cfmail.htm
Regards,
Dave.
~|
Find out how
Hi,
Whenever I generate an MS Word document, it always view in "normal view".
How do I make it to display in "print view"?
I always save the document as web page to view the source code and that is
always in "normal view". So I never know what is the code for "print view".
Sincerely,
Johnny Le
the option is not on any of my production CFMX6.1 servers,
jb.
>Ya know, I looked for that option but couldn't find it in the 6.1 admin.
>Someone else on the list told me that its a feature only available on
>6.1 Enterprise. If it's available on Standard, can you point me to it?
>
>Thanks for
it shouldn't do. If you set it up to use the internal webserver then the CFIDE
folder will be located in cfusionmx7/wwwroot and then once you connect it to
IIS/Apache you'll need to replace the CFIDE mapping to the CFMX7 CFIDE folder
cos you'll end up trying to admin a CFMX7 server with the CFM
>>So it's a problem with CF or with both browsers.
It's a problem with the HTML standard. There should exist some DEFAULT
attribute for controls.
ie:
Fortunately, there is a DEFAULT option in http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL
Ya know, I looked for that option but couldn't find it in the 6.1 admin.
Someone else on the list told me that its a feature only available on
6.1 Enterprise. If it's available on Standard, can you point me to it?
Thanks for the reply!
Rey...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Plus you can create a C
> Interesting, want some feedback?
> - Not happy about your repeated use of evaluate in the
> base object
> - have you created any real world HTML pages using this?
> I would be interested to see how much code is required to
> generate a complex html page
If done well, it shouldn't take much code
It was plain HTML but it's all fixed (no problem in the first place,
apart from between the keyboard and the chair).
On 7/6/05, Mike Klostermeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is these checkboxes within a CFForm, or plain HTML?
>
>
~
Hi John. Thanks for the feedback. If I uninstall 6.1, will it remove the
CFIDE virtual dir? Any other issues I should be aware of?
Rey...
John Beynon wrote:
> I've done side by side installs before and when it's finished it imports your
> cf6.1 settings. I think it's safer to do this and then c
Is these checkboxes within a CFForm, or plain HTML?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Frigging annoying Checkbox behaviour
I vaguely recall reading this somewhere before; when I submit a form
Bryan,
Along the lines of what Dave Watts said, perhaps you could have a page
that uses CFHTTP to call the page and get the data you want it to
display and then you can handle the security for your people at that
level. That might be better for keeping the display updated so you
don't have to rem
Plus you can create a CAR file in your 6.1 and use it after install of 7.0
> I've done side by side installs before and when it's finished it imports
> your cf6.1 settings. I think it's safer to do this and then connect CFMX7
> to your webserver once it's all working fine and dandy. Once the proc
I've done side by side installs before and when it's finished it imports your
cf6.1 settings. I think it's safer to do this and then connect CFMX7 to your
webserver once it's all working fine and dandy. Once the process is complete
you can remove cf6.1
john.
>Hi all. I'm trying to upgrade our
Well as far as I can see the merger still hasn't taken place.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 13:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Oh..my...god!
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 00:54, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> Macromedia.com site as fuel for wi
Don't worry all; my brain froze up and I forgot to check the input to
a query based on the list of values in the checkboxes. Since the list
was empty, the input was an empty string, which happens to be the
default for that CFC argument, which happens to return the whole list
of items. I think I sho
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 00:54, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> Macromedia.com site as fuel for wild speculation that maybe CF isn't
> as important to MM or that maybe they're planning to discontinue it --
Not that MM have very much say in it anymore...
:jabs in the direction of Adobe, who still haven't
Ahh, you're using Oracle. Yea, it's going to choke on that one. You could
always try porting it. :)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/06/05 12:37AM >>>
That's unlikely to work in Oracle ;-)
On 7/6/05, Chris Terrebonne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Included below is a stored procedure that y
just to double check...you don't have any s on the action
page that would instantiate the checkboxes into the form scope?
On 7/6/05, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll restate the behaviour I see:
>
> 1) I have a form with multiple checkboxes (with names and values)
> 2) NONE of them
James Holmes wrote:
> I'll restate the behaviour I see:
>
> 1) I have a form with multiple checkboxes (with names and values)
> 2) NONE of them are checked
> 3) I submit the form
> 4) They ALL show up in the form scope when I cfloop over the FORM collection
>
> This contradicts the W3C reccomenda
I'll restate the behaviour I see:
1) I have a form with multiple checkboxes (with names and values)
2) NONE of them are checked
3) I submit the form
4) They ALL show up in the form scope when I cfloop over the FORM collection
This contradicts the W3C reccomendation as I read it.
On 7/6/05, Joche
James Holmes wrote:
> So it's a problem
It is not a problem, it is the way it works.
Jochem
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a
So it's a problem with CF or with both browsers. I'll check if it
happens in CF 7 too.
On 7/6/05, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kerry wrote:
> > IIRC, unticked checkboxes should not exist in the form scope.
>
> Correct: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.2
>
daniel kessler wrote:
>> On 7/5/05, Daniel Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>AND cs_price <> >> value="">
>>
>> AND cs_price IS NOT NULL
>
> this worked great! thanks!
>
> but why? IOW, why does this work, but these do not:
> AND cs_price <> NULL
> AND cs_price != NULL
Becau
Thanks for the explanation Jochem. It doesn't sound all that optimistic.
As for the plug, I'll at least add my noise to my System Administrator here on
campus.
> Stored procedures are not very portable (yet) between databases.
> The SQL standardization committee was late defining a standard
>
>Cause NULL is not a value per say it would work if it were <> 'NULL'
>assuming NULL is in the column.
well THAT'S gonna be hard to remember. Well maybe this was painful enough to
remember it next time.
thanks for the explanation.
~~~
Cause NULL is not a value per say it would work if it were <> 'NULL'
assuming NULL is in the column.
-Original Message-
From: daniel kessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 12:30
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Query help
>On 7/5/05, Daniel Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> a
daniel kessler wrote:
> hey thanks guys. I already implemented a clunkier way, but I'd be interested
> in saving Chris' stored procedure until I'm good enough to implement it.
> I'll be implementing searches forever into the future. Why wouldn't it work
> in Oracle (which is my DB)?
Stored p
>On 7/5/05, Daniel Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> an empty string. So I've adjusted the query so that if the store =
>> 'convenience' then the price must not equal empt string.
>>
>> AND cs_price <> > value="">
>
>AND cs_price IS NOT NULL
this worked great! thanks!
but why? I
Kerry wrote:
> IIRC, unticked checkboxes should not exist in the form scope.
Correct: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.2
Jochem
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
a
hey thanks guys. I already implemented a clunkier way, but I'd be interested
in saving Chris' stored procedure until I'm good enough to implement it. I'll
be implementing searches forever into the future. Why wouldn't it work in
Oracle (which is my DB)?
> That's unlikely to work in Oracle ;-
Hi all. I'm trying to upgrade our CFMX 6.1 Standard installation to CFMX
7 Standard. So to make life easier, I downloaded the trial of CFMX 7
Standard from the MM site instead of having to upload the contents of
our 2 CFMX 7 Standard CDs.
When I run the CFMX 7 install, I punch in the serial num
IIRC, unticked checkboxes should not exist in the form scope.
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 July 2005 11:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Frigging annoying Checkbox behaviour
I vaguely recall reading this somewhere before; when I submit a form
full of un
Interesting, want some feedback?
- Not happy about your repeated use of evaluate in the base object
- have you created any real world HTML pages using this?
I would be interested to see how much code is required to generate a complex
html page
-Original Message-
From: Martin Orth [mailto:
I vaguely recall reading this somewhere before; when I submit a form
full of unticked checkboxes to CF (6.1 in this case), the checkboxes
are defined (along with their checked values) in the form structure
when I loop through it yet they aren't listed in the FORM.FieldNames
variable. This happens i
FYI
The cfxhtmlbeans project basic parts are a ColdFusion code generator and a
xHTML schema parser.
For each xHTML elemement(html tag) within the schema the generator creates a
CFC with the name
of the element. eg. table.cfc for the element table. This allows seperation
of business logic an
I've just read that Gartner is now branching out of the ICT industry
and is making recommendations on baked goods. Thay say in their latest
report that cupcakes are a niche market and all businesses should
transition to the two defacto industry standard cakes, which are
three-tier layered chocolate
Damn it, Jim beat me too it!
Having been subjected to the darkside of the .NET lately I can
honestly say I feel bloated and somewhat icky and violated (OK I'm
taking this too far) ... just like I would be if I ate some huge
monsterous thing topped off with marzepan.
However, some cup cakes spread
I have hosted Exchange with them, although I'm only using it with my MS
SmartPhone and not Blackberry. Absolutely no problem at all with them 0 they're
always helpful 24x7 and the service is premium!
jb.
>Hi all,
>
>
>
>Can anyone suggest any good providers for hosted Exchange with Blackberry
76 matches
Mail list logo
