> Yes, it's the TRIM. Thanks... I'm just so used to using trim
> I never thought about it trimming spaces when they are part
> of the encrypted value. But now I'll remember that.
Just a couple of other semi-OT notes... the default encryption
algorithm (CFMX_COMPAT) is not very secure by anyone
Yes, it's the TRIM. Thanks... I'm just so used to using trim I never thought
about it trimming spaces when they are part of the encrypted value. But now
I'll remember that.
Thanks
Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin & Williams
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100
Hauppauge
He could leave the first one if he so chose. It wouldn't be lending to the
problem.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Alan Rother wrote:
>
> It's the TRIM functions, remove them
>
> This works
>
>
>
>
>
> Original
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alan Rother
> Manager, Phoenix Cold Fusion User Group, ww
It's the TRIM functions, remove them
This works
Original
--
Alan Rother
Manager, Phoenix Cold Fusion User Group, www.AZCFUG.org
Twitter: @AlanRother
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/
It's the TRIM functions, remove them
This works
request.testval = "6546";
request.inval = encrypt(request.testval,"sn");
request.outval = decrypt(request.inval,"sn");
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
>
> Who's arguing?
> And I'd disagree that improving your syntax isn
Who's arguing?
And I'd disagree that improving your syntax isn't helpful.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Robert Harrison wrote:
>
> Yep... That's OT and not very helpful to argue about syntax :-(
>
>
> Robert B. Harrison
> Director of Interactive Services
> Austin & Williams
> 125 Kennedy
Er, remove from the decrypt call.
--
Rodney
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/me
I'd start by removing trim() from your encrypt call. Any change to an
encyrtped value will cause failure.
--
Rodney
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Robert Harrison wrote:
>
> This has got to be a bug.
>
> The question is does this make CF encrypt and decrypt totally unreliable,
> or is there
Yep... That's OT and not very helpful to argue about syntax :-(
Robert B. Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin & Williams
125 Kennedy Drive, Suite 100
Hauppauge NY 11788
P : 631.231.6600 Ext. 119
F : 631.434.7022
http://www.austin-williams.com
Great advertising can't be either/or
OT:
You can nix the extraneous pound signs.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Robert Harrison wrote:
>
> Am I doing something wrong here? See these lines of code.
>
>
>
>
>
> This gives the error: The input and output encodings are not same.
>
> Most of the time this works fine. Change t
This has got to be a bug.
The question is does this make CF encrypt and decrypt totally unreliable, or is
there something I know I can count on to work around this... like make a longer
key or something?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Harrison [mailto:rob...@austin-williams.com]
S
Am I doing something wrong here? See these lines of code.
This gives the error: The input and output encodings are not same.
Most of the time this works fine. Change the testval or change the key it
works... but every now and then I get the error.
Am I doing something wrong, or is this a
Wireshark certainly is daunting, but if you start reading the guide it will
start to make sense.
All you really need to do is set it monitoring, send the email from CF that
gets stuck, and look at the traffic that resulted, it will show you the
conversation between the 2 servers and if Google did
Hey Russ, something OT do you do dedicated hosting? If so do you want to
ping me offlist, have some questions regarding a dedicated server with Plesk
Panel.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
>
> did you try wireshark?
>
> --
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andysco
No not yet Russ, being a server that I don't own I am a bit reluctant. But
if I have no choice then I have no choice, but if I have too do this.
What specifically would I be looking for? I find wireshark daunting at the
best of times.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Russ Michaels wrote:
>
> d
did you try wireshark?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Andrew Scott wrote:
>
> Well I went looking through the mail box, and there are emails there that
> have been sent. So it looks like it is being selective, but not sure why...
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Billy Cravens
> wrote:
Well I went looking through the mail box, and there are emails there that
have been sent. So it looks like it is being selective, but not sure why...
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Billy Cravens wrote:
>
> My experience has been that it automatically overwrites the from address to
> the spe
My experience has been that it automatically overwrites the from address to the
specified, but I only deal with that in development. (Perhaps that behavior has
changed recently)
Billy Cravens
bdcrav...@gmail.com
On Aug 31, 2011, at 1:45 AM, Andrew Scott wrote:
>
> Thanks Billy, that was m
18 matches
Mail list logo
