Re: Feedback on this approach to many sites, one codebase (MSOC)

2011-02-23 Thread Jane Williams
Our sites run 24/7: we have no maintenance window that size. I bet I'm not the only one, either. - Original Message From: Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Wed, 23 February, 2011 14:21:31 Subject: Re: Feedback on this approach to many sites,

Re: Feedback on this approach to many sites, one codebase (MSOC)

2011-02-23 Thread Jane Williams
with no exceptions is a policy vs. a true necessity. Unless you are perhaps in the defence industry. Live code push? *shudders* On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Jane Williams janewilliam...@yahoo.co.ukwrote: Our sites run 24/7: we have no maintenance window that size. I bet I'm not the only one

Re: Invalid Precision Value from SQL Server CF9

2011-02-18 Thread Jane Williams
Surely a bit field will need 0 or 1, not a string? Or was that not what you meant? - Original Message From: Nicki Tabb vnt...@alaska.edu To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Fri, 18 February, 2011 15:32:19 Subject: Re: Invalid Precision Value from SQL Server CF9 The default

Re: cf-talk replies

2011-02-17 Thread Jane Williams
This got to me - but in my spam folder :( - Original Message From: Rob Voyle robvo...@voyle.com To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Thu, 17 February, 2011 6:42:52 Subject: cf-talk replies Hi Folks I have noticed recently that when I reply to a cf-talk email My email is not

Re: cf-talk replies

2011-02-17 Thread Jane Williams
Take a look at the full headers of the message you're replying to, and see what email client you're using when it works (and when it doesn't). Headers of the one I'm replying to now say Reply-To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com From: Rob Voyle robvo...@voyle.com I know some email clients (like the