Re: [Re: [OT: Complex Select]]

2001-07-22 Thread Alex
with Access no. you could bring back all the data and display only the results you want with cfloop but that is inefficient and a hackish mess. "Michael Lugassy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Alex, The Database is Access, how can I loop, exactly? Michael. > what dastabase? you could do it it in a

RE: [OT: Complex Select]

2001-07-22 Thread David Shadovitz
This makes no sense. Unless you've got an "order by" clause, there is no order to the rows, so choosing rows 2-4 is no different than choosing rows 1-3 or 18-20. Perhaps you want "order by personID asc" combined with "select top 4", and then ignore the 1st row in the result. -David On Sunday,

Re: [OT: Complex Select]

2001-07-22 Thread Michael Lugassy
Alex, The Database is Access, how can I loop, exactly? Michael. > what dastabase? you could do it it in a stored proc with a loop > > "Michael Lugassy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to SQL-SELECT a specific number of rows from between the result > set. > NOT by using the BETWEEN

Re: [OT: Complex Select]

2001-07-22 Thread Alex
what dastabase? you could do it it in a stored proc with a loop "Michael Lugassy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is it possible to SQL-SELECT a specific number of rows from between the result set. NOT by using the BETWEEN keyword in the WHERE clause, but by choosing to select only rows x through y.

OT: Complex Select

2001-07-22 Thread Michael Lugassy
Is it possible to SQL-SELECT a specific number of rows from between the result set. NOT by using the BETWEEN keyword in the WHERE clause, but by choosing to select only rows x through y. let's say I have this results set personID personNAME 1 Michael 2 Roman