Re: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-18 Thread peter . tilbrook
And don't forget hot can develop MX 6.1 with the "Developer Edition" for free. BlueDragon 6.1 from www.newatlanta.com (currently in beta) is another alternative you could consider. Peter Tilbrook Transitional Services - Enterprise eSolutions Centrelink (http://www.centrelink.gov.au) 2 Faulding Str

Re: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread Ben Doom
You could always write UDFs that create the queries, then call a generic   query include. Not terribly elegant, but maybe a quick solution. --Ben Doom Rick Root wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >  > Yeah, I thought about doing that, but you can't perform queries... d'oh. > > Not in UDFs,

RE: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread Samuel R. Neff
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:35 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: 5.0 Development Practices > > Hi all, > > I'm fairly new to CF and I've just started an Application > that will run on a Coldfusion 5.0 server. > > So far from all the r

Re: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread Rick Root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yeah, I thought about doing that, but you can't perform queries... d'oh. Not in UDFs, no... that's where custom tags come in.   - Rick [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

RE: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread rob.stokes
Yeah, I thought about doing that, but you can't perform queries... d'oh. -Original Message- From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 December 2003 7:00 pm To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: 5.0 Development Practices You still have custom tags and udfs to play with.   

RE: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread Adrian Lynch
Subject: 5.0 Development Practices Hi all, I'm fairly new to CF and I've just started an Application that will run on a Coldfusion 5.0 server. So far from all the resources I've been reading (net and books) I'm beginning to get pretty annoyed at its lack of 'features' co

Re: 5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread Rick Root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So far from all the resources I've been reading (net and books) I'm > beginning to get pretty annoyed at its lack of 'features' compared to > CFMX 6.0/6.1. So far as I can tell CF Components, CFFUNCTION etc are > only available in 6+, and I keep coming across occasio

5.0 Development Practices

2003-12-17 Thread rob.stokes
Hi all, I'm fairly new to CF and I've just started an Application that will run on a Coldfusion 5.0 server. So far from all the resources I've been reading (net and books) I'm beginning to get pretty annoyed at its lack of 'features' compared to CFMX 6.0/6.1. So far as I can tell CF Components, C