Re: Access 2003 ODBC

- Original Message - From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: RE: Access 2003 ODBC > If you have the latest version of Jet on your server, it can read > Access 2000

Re: Access 2003 ODBC

- Original Message - From: "Claude Schneegans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 11:31 AM Subject: Re: Access 2003 ODBC > >>would probably find it more convenient to use Access 2003 on the &

Re: Access 2003 ODBC

>>would probably find it more convenient to use Access 2003 on the server. As far as CF is concerned, there is NO Access on the server: only an Access file and an ODBC driver. The Access application is not used. The file can be Access 95, 97 2000 or 2003, it does not really make a big difference.

RE: Access 2003 ODBC

> Thanks. That helps, but it's still not clear whether that > means you can or cannot use an Access 2003 with the last > version of the Jet engine. There's no reason to 'upgrade' > to Access 2003, just that someone with Access 2003 installed > on their workstations would probably find it more c

Re: Access 2003 ODBC

- Original Message - From: "Samuel R. Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 8:07 PM Subject: RE: Access 2003 ODBC > Access 2000 is the last major release of the Jet engine, so the data portion > of t

RE: Access 2003 ODBC

om/go/team > -Original Message- > From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 4:27 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Access 2003 ODBC > > I've got a couple small web sites currently using Access 2000 and w

Access 2003 ODBC

I've got a couple small web sites currently using Access 2000 and was wondering what was necessary to use Access 2003.  Is there a particular rev level that the MS MDAC drivers need to be at on a Windows 2000/IIS 5 system to use Access 2003 as an ODBC data source? [Todays Threads] [This Message]