Re: Activmail, tokens, and jrun memory

Curious, what's wrong with CFMAIL? DK On 1/5/07, Jerry Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been using the activmail tag for years now, and it has always worked well. I have a new email we are sending that uses the token replacement (for the first time). As soon as a trigger it for

Re: Activmail, tokens, and jrun memory

In CF 6.0, cfmail was pretty unreliable. These days, with CF7 Enterprise, there's probably no need for ActivMail. On 1/8/07, Douglas Knudsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Curious, what's wrong with CFMAIL? -- CFAJAX docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/

RE: Activmail, tokens, and jrun memory

: Activmail, tokens, and jrun memory I have been using the activmail tag for years now, and it has always worked well. I have a new email we are sending that uses the token replacement (for the first time). As soon as a trigger it for as few as 500 emails, jrun instantly goes above 1GB of memory

Activmail, tokens, and jrun memory

I have been using the activmail tag for years now, and it has always worked well. I have a new email we are sending that uses the token replacement (for the first time). As soon as a trigger it for as few as 500 emails, jrun instantly goes above 1GB of memory, and hangs, also hanging cfmx7. The