Has anyone developed to this RFC yet?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
--
Yes. The Bergin Linux Users Group in Norway has a working model of this RFC:
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/
enjoy,
larry
--
Larry C. Lyons
Web Analyst
BEI Resources
American Type Culture Collection
email:
Has anyone developed to this RFC yet?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
--
CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.com/
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:233457
James Holmes wrote:
Has anyone developed to this RFC yet?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
We all have, it is completely transparent to higher layers.
Jochem
~|
Message:
I developed a beta or you might say fledgling system but my cat ate it
before deployment.
On 2/25/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone developed to this RFC yet?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt
--
CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
Ah yes, one the primary sources of packet loss for this data transport method.
On 2/25/06, Michael Traher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I developed a beta or you might say fledgling system but my cat ate it
before deployment.
On 2/25/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone
Yes, this method is known for dropping packets.
On 2/25/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah yes, one the primary sources of packet loss for this data transport method.
~|
Message:
I've found the results to be flighty, at best.
Jim Wright wrote:
Yes, this method is known for dropping packets.
On 2/25/06, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah yes, one the primary sources of packet loss for this data transport
method.
And I don't think the US governement likes this method, I've heard
that some of the top officials, right up to the vice president, are
trying to shoot it down. Not having much luck, though.
On 2/25/06, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found the results to be flighty, at best.
Jim
8 matches
Mail list logo
